jilisakto
2025-01-13 2025 European Cup jilisakto
News
Crying is a quintessential human experience. Claire Danes does it . Kim Kardashian does it . Even Michael Jordan does it . And no matter how long it has been since you last shed a tear, there is no doubt that you’ve done it, too. Other species produce tears, but ours is the only one that scientists believe consistently cries not just to lubricate and protect the eyeballs, but also to express emotion – like after a breakup, at graduation ceremonies and while watching The Notebook. While they are one of the few things that make us uniquely human, in many ways, emotional tears remain an enigma. Research has revealed that our emotions are even more complicated than neuroscientists once thought; there is no one area of the brain that’s responsible for feelings of sadness or anger, for instance. And scientists have yet to scan people’s brains to see what happens while they are crying. Still, some progress has been made to help us understand human tears – to grasp what they’re made of, why we create them (some of us more than others) and why producing them can help us feel better. Practically any creature that has eyeballs produces two sets of tears: Basal and reflex. Basal tears keep the eye moist, while reflex tears are meant to protect the eye from irritants like dust. Humans also shed a third type, fittingly called emotional tears, when they are sad, frustrated, overwhelmed, happy or moved. All three types of tears are structurally similar in that they are primarily made of water, oils, mucus, antibacterial proteins and electrolytes, said Darlene Dartt, a professor of ophthalmology at Harvard Medical School. You probably rarely, if ever, notice basal tears, which are released in tiny amounts throughout the day. As they evaporate, the temperature on the surface of the eyeballs drops slightly, which signals that the eyes should produce more basal tears to avoid drying out. Reflex and emotional tears release more liquid, which is why your eyes well up while you’re chopping onions or why tears stream down your face at a funeral. That extra liquid mainly comes from special tear glands located underneath the eyebrows that are regulated by cells in the brainstem. With reflex tears, nerves in the eyes signal to the brainstem that tears are needed to flush out whatever is irritating them. For emotional tears, scientists think that other parts of the brain activate those brainstem cells to turn on the tear glands. Lots of animals wail in distress. Experts think that they – and we – evolved to do so in infancy as a means of survival. That’s because the animals that cry vocally, namely mammals and birds, tend to rely on a mother or father. A robin chick’s peeps and a goat kid’s bleats are the baby’s main way to solicit care from a parent when it’s hungry, scared or in pain . But animals don’t shed emotional tears when they cry. And for the first several weeks of their lives, neither do humans. Instead, similar to other animals, newborn babies produce a heartbreaking (and ear-piercing) bawl. Then, sometime in the first month or two, salty fluid starts to fall from their eyes as well. It’s a bit of a mystery why we started to produce tears while upset, rather than continuing to cry with dry eyes like sloths or bats do. It’s possible that the act of scrunching up your face to unleash a yowl puts pressure on the eyeballs, stimulating the tear glands, said Ad Vingerhoets, an emeritus professor of clinical psychology at Tilburg University in the Netherlands and one of the foremost experts in human crying. That may be why yawning, laughing and vomiting can lead to tears as well, he added. Tears may also hold an evolutionary advantage over howls, and as we age, we become more able to cry quietly. While anyone on an aeroplane can hear an infant wail, only those sitting in the seats near you will see tears roll down your cheeks while you watch the opening sequence of Up. In that way, tears can more subtly alert others nearby to someone’s distress without giving the person away to predators that may be lurking , said Lauren Bylsma, an associate professor of psychiatry and psychology at the University of Pittsburgh. For the first years of our lives, we mostly shed tears related to our own experiences – a busted knee, a bee sting or a dropped ice cream cone. That starts to change as we grow older and become more emotionally and socially developed. We cry less in response to physical pain and more over our emotional connections to other people. “Your world becomes greater, so there are more people who become more important for you,” Dr Vingerhoets said. One of the most common reasons for crying is the absence or loss of a loved one, whether we’re homesick as children, heartbroken in adolescence or grieving a death at any age. We cry over the plights of others, too. These empathetic tears may occur because we are imagining ourselves in other people’s shoes, whether they are friends, strangers or even fictional characters. In fact, this is how scientists study crying: They show people a sad clip from a film and see if it turns on the waterworks. While sadness is the emotion most typically associated with crying, what many tearful experiences have in common is a sense of helplessness or powerlessness. That feeling of powerlessness often accompanies tears of frustration, and it may even explain the tears some people shed when they feel emotionally overwhelmed, whether from joy, anxiety or awe. In fact, Dr Vingerhoets called helplessness “the core element of crying”, since it harks back to the original evolutionary purpose of tears: Needing assistance or support. Cliche as it is, the biggest predictor of how often someone cries is gender. Research from around the world has found that women consistently cry more frequently than men. Much of that difference is likely to be the result of societal pressures and gender norms, experts say. Consider the fact that little boys and girls cry about the same amount, said Jonathan Rottenberg, a professor of psychology at Cornell University. Only over time does a tearful gender gap start to emerge. Part of the reason may be that society largely teaches boys the importance of being tough. “Boys might inhibit their crying for fear of violating a gender stereotype,” Dr Rottenberg said. Hormones may play a role as well. The gender gap in crying tends to emerge during adolescence, when sex hormones kick in, and one hypothesis is that testosterone may suppress tears or that swings in oestrogen levels make the crying response more likely. But there is little research on the topic, and one of the few studies that examined the connection between hormones and tears found that, despite commonly held beliefs about premenstrual syndrome, women were not more likely to cry during any particular phase of their cycles. Certain personality traits appear to influence how much people cry. Highly empathetic people tend to report crying more, as do people who are more neurotic, Dr Vingerhoets said. Then there are things we do to our bodies that increase the odds – namely, drink alcohol and neglect sleep. Doing either can cause people to cry more easily, most likely because they lower inhibition, making it harder to hold back tears. Perhaps the longest-running debate among researchers is why crying often makes people feel better. One of the largest studies to investigate the concept asked thousands of people from around the world about the last time they shed tears. A little over half reported feeling better afterward, almost 40 per cent experienced no difference and 10 per cent said they actually felt worse. Crying, especially when alone, may serve as a sort of self-therapy. “It forces you to think about whatever you’re crying about,” Dr Bylsma said. “To deal with it cognitively, emotionally, and kind of process whatever that thing is that’s upsetting you.” People tend to report feeling better if the crying episode was prompted by an issue that could be solved, like a disagreement with a partner, rather than by a situation outside of their control, like the loss of a loved one, Dr Vingerhoets said. In social situations, the biggest factor influencing how you feel after crying is how the people around you react . People who receive a supportive response, like a hug or validation of their feelings, tend to feel better, while those whose tears are met with anger or ridicule are more likely to feel worse. This makes sense, as experts think the primary purpose of the tear, no matter your age, is to communicate distress to others. “It is there to signal to others when help is needed and when someone is feeling separated and not attached to care,” Dr Rottenberg said. The lesson: When someone cries around you, show you’re there for that person. The science says it really does help. By Dana G Smith © The New York Times Company The article originally appeared in The New York Times .Advisors Asset Management Inc. raised its position in Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. ( NYSE:IIPR – Free Report ) by 178.0% in the third quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 1,248 shares of the company’s stock after buying an additional 799 shares during the quarter. Advisors Asset Management Inc.’s holdings in Innovative Industrial Properties were worth $168,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Several other large investors have also modified their holdings of IIPR. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP grew its stake in shares of Innovative Industrial Properties by 16.2% in the 2nd quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 328,344 shares of the company’s stock valued at $35,862,000 after purchasing an additional 45,779 shares during the last quarter. Jupiter Asset Management Ltd. grew its position in Innovative Industrial Properties by 279.1% in the 2nd quarter. Jupiter Asset Management Ltd. now owns 47,343 shares of the company’s stock valued at $5,171,000 after buying an additional 34,854 shares during the last quarter. Thrivent Financial for Lutherans increased its stake in Innovative Industrial Properties by 97.5% in the 2nd quarter. Thrivent Financial for Lutherans now owns 48,034 shares of the company’s stock valued at $5,246,000 after buying an additional 23,709 shares during the period. Edgestream Partners L.P. raised its position in Innovative Industrial Properties by 461.0% during the 2nd quarter. Edgestream Partners L.P. now owns 26,888 shares of the company’s stock worth $2,937,000 after buying an additional 22,095 shares during the last quarter. Finally, LSV Asset Management lifted its stake in shares of Innovative Industrial Properties by 21.0% in the 2nd quarter. LSV Asset Management now owns 122,646 shares of the company’s stock worth $13,395,000 after acquiring an additional 21,273 shares during the period. 70.58% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds. Innovative Industrial Properties Price Performance IIPR stock opened at $109.17 on Friday. The company has a current ratio of 11.53, a quick ratio of 11.53 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.15. The company’s 50-day moving average price is $123.47 and its 200 day moving average price is $118.63. Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. has a 52 week low of $80.24 and a 52 week high of $138.35. The company has a market cap of $3.09 billion, a P/E ratio of 19.43 and a beta of 1.37. Innovative Industrial Properties Dividend Announcement The company also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Tuesday, October 15th. Shareholders of record on Monday, September 30th were issued a $1.90 dividend. This represents a $7.60 annualized dividend and a yield of 6.96%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Monday, September 30th. Innovative Industrial Properties’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is 135.23%. Analyst Ratings Changes A number of brokerages have recently issued reports on IIPR. Roth Capital upgraded shares of Innovative Industrial Properties to a “strong-buy” rating in a research note on Monday, November 11th. Wolfe Research upgraded Innovative Industrial Properties to a “hold” rating in a research report on Monday, September 23rd. Compass Point raised Innovative Industrial Properties from a “neutral” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $125.00 price target for the company in a report on Friday, November 8th. Finally, Piper Sandler decreased their price target on Innovative Industrial Properties from $120.00 to $118.00 and set a “neutral” rating on the stock in a research note on Friday, November 8th. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, two have given a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the company’s stock. According to MarketBeat, Innovative Industrial Properties has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $127.67. Read Our Latest Stock Report on Innovative Industrial Properties About Innovative Industrial Properties ( Free Report ) Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc is a self-advised Maryland corporation focused on the acquisition, ownership and management of specialized properties leased to experienced, state-licensed operators for their regulated cannabis facilities. Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, commencing with the year ended December 31, 2017. Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Innovative Industrial Properties Airline Stocks – Top Airline Stocks to Buy Now The Latest 13F Filings Are In: See Where Big Money Is Flowing What is Insider Trading? What You Can Learn from Insider Trading 3 Penny Stocks Ready to Break Out in 2025 What Are Dividend Challengers? FMC, Mosaic, Nutrien: Top Agricultural Stocks With Big Potential Want to see what other hedge funds are holding IIPR? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. ( NYSE:IIPR – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Innovative Industrial Properties Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Innovative Industrial Properties and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .
jilisakto
。
Connor Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. Has $515,000 Stock Holdings in Resources Connection, Inc. (NASDAQ:RGP)None
It's rivalry week in college football and some of the participants are willing to bleed for their respective teams, literally. Senior defensive assistant coach Chuck Cecil of the Arizona Wildcats is the current leader in the clubhouse in terms of blood shed for his squad on Saturday, Nov. 30, after a perplexing interaction with one of his players on the sideline. Cecil, who played defensive back for the university between 1984-87, was so pumped up before the game that he headbutted current Wildcats defensive back Owen Gross several times before the game. In a video captured by Fox Sports and posted to social media, Cecil can be seen banging his bare forehead into Gross's helmet until he begins to bleed profusely. Unfortunately for everyone involved, Arizona allowed rival Arizona State to score 35 points in the first half of the in-state rivalry game, which led to some jokes made at Cecil's expense. If I made myself bleed by repeatedly mashing my head into a helmet and my defense proceeded to give up 35 in the first half I’m not sure I’m on the sideline for the second half https://t.co/EdNk6olDNj "If I made myself bleed by repeatedly mashing my head into a helmet and my defense proceeded to give up 35 in the first half, I'm not sure I'm on the sideline for the second half," Brad Spielberger, formerly of Pro Football Focus, posted to X . The Wildcats entered the contest 4-7 on the season and won't play in a bowl game this year. What was left for Arizona was to play spoiler to the 9-2 Sun Devils, who have a chance to make the 12-team field for the College Football Playoffs , though an upset doesn't appear likely now after a 35-0 first half score. Related: Fan Handcuffed by Police After Wild Arizona State-BYU Finish
GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Green Bay Packers wide receiver Romeo Doubs left his team’s game against the San Francisco 49ers on Sunday because of a concussion. Doubs’ injury came on a third-quarter play in the end zone that resulted in a pass interference penalty against San Francisco’s Renardo Green. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings. Get any of our free email newsletters — news headlines, obituaries, sports, and more.
By Chibuike Oguh and Medha Singh NEW YORK (Reuters) -An index of global stock markets edged higher in choppy trading on Thursday as investors digested lackluster revenue forecasts from artificial-intelligence chipmaker Nvidia and bitcoin approached the $100,000 milestone. Shares of Nvidia, the world’s most valuable company and a major contributor to the gains this year in the benchmark S&P 500, hit a record high early in the session but retreated to end up 0.53%. The chipmaker forecast its slowest revenue growth in seven quarters. “(Nvidia’s) results are still good but I think the disappointment came from maybe not quite as much of an upward guide on the Q4 number for the top line,” said Garrett Melson, portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers in Boston. On Wall Street, the three main indexes finished higher in a choppy session led by gains in utilities, financials, consumer staples and industrials. Communication services stocks were the biggest drag, driven by losses in Alphabet, which ended down about 6%. U.S. prosecutors argued on Wednesday that Alphabet must divest its popular Chrome browser to end Google’s search monopoly. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.06% to 43,870.35, the S&P 500 rose 0.53% to 5,948.71 and the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.03% to 18,972.42. MSCI’s gauge of stocks across the globe was up 0.38% to 851.05 after losing ground early in the session. European shares were up 0.41%, buoyed by a rally in energy and technology stocks. “The market seems to be looking for a narrative right now and is in a little bit of a void for any news that can shape the direction of things,” Melson added. Bitcoin soared and is closing in on the $100,000 milestone. The world’s largest cryptocurrency has gained more than 40% since Donald Trump won the Nov. 5 election, driven by expectations that his administration will be crypto-friendly. It gained 3.75% to $98,005.00. Ethereum rose 8.77% to $3,350.80. Markets are also eyeing Trump’s pick for Treasury secretary, who will play a key role in implementing his agenda of tariffs, tax cuts and deregulation. The dollar rose in choppy trading as investors assessed declining weekly jobless claims, suggesting labor-market strength, and comments from two Federal Reserve governors on the path of interest rates. Against the Japanese yen, the dollar weakened 0.62% to 154.45 but it strengthened 0.29% to 0.887 against the Swiss franc. The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro,rose 0.37% to 107, reaching a 13-month high. The euro down 0.41% at $1.0479. Oil prices settled up about 2% after Russia and Ukraine exchanged missiles, raising crude-supply concerns. Brent crude futures rose 1.95% to $74.23 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures increased 2% to $70.10. Spot gold rose, on track for the fourth-consecutive session of gains after hitting a more than one-week high. Spot gold rose 0.8% to $2,671.28 an ounce. U.S. gold futures settled 0.9% higher at $2,674.90. (Reporting by Chibuike Oguh in New York; Editing by William Maclean, Kirsten Donovan, Rod Nickel and Cynthia Osterman) Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibilty for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );
But it is not the largest prize a person has won in this country. Here are the 10 biggest UK lottery winners – all from EuroMillions draws – and what some of them did with their fortunes. – Anonymous, £195,707,000 A UK ticket-holder scooped the record EuroMillions jackpot of £195 million on July 19 2022 – the biggest National Lottery win of all time. – Joe and Jess Thwaite, £184,262,899.10 Joe and Jess Thwaite, from Gloucester, scooped a then record-breaking £184,262,899 with a Lucky Dip ticket for the draw on May 10 2022. At the time, Joe was a communications sales engineer, and Jess ran a hairdressing salon with her sister. – Unclaimed ticket holder, £177 million Tuesday’s winner is wealthier than former One Direction member Harry Styles and heavyweight boxer Anthony Joshua, who are both worth £175 million, according to the latest Sunday Times Rich List. Players have been urged to check their tickets to see if they can claim the prize. – Anonymous, £170,221,000 The fourth biggest winner of the National Lottery to date scooped £170 million in October 2019, after matching all the numbers in a Must Be Won draw. – Colin and Chris Weir, £161,653,000 Colin and Chris Weir, from Largs, North Ayrshire, bagged their historic winnings in July 2011, making them the biggest UK winners at the time. Colin used £2.5 million of his fortune to invest in his beloved Partick Thistle Football Club, which led to one of the stands at the stadium being named after him. He later acquired a 55% shareholding in the club, which was to be passed into the hands of the local community upon his death. He died in December 2019, aged 71. The couple also set up the Weir Charitable Trust in 2013 and donated £1 million to the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. They divorced in the same year as Colin’s death. – Adrian and Gillian Bayford, £148,656,000 Adrian and Gillian won 190 million euros in a EuroMillions draw in August 2012, which came to just over £148 million. The couple bought a Grade II listed estate in Cambridgeshire, complete with cinema and billiards room, but it was sold in 2021, some years after the pair divorced, as reported by The Mirror. – Anonymous, £123,458,008 The seventh biggest National Lottery winner won a Superdraw rollover jackpot in June 2019, and decided not to go public with their success. – Anonymous, £122,550,350 After nine rollovers, one lucky anonymous ticket-holder bagged more than £122 million in April 2021. – Anonymous, £121,328,187 Another of the UK’s top 10 lottery winners found their fortune through a Superdraw jackpot rollover, this time in April 2018. – Frances and Patrick Connolly, £114,969,775 Former social worker and teacher Frances set up two charitable foundations after she and her husband won almost £115 million on New Year’s Day 2019. She estimates that she has already given away £60 million to charitable causes, as well as friends and family. She considers helping others to be an addiction, saying: “It gives you a buzz and it’s addictive. I’m addicted to it now.”Isaac Brown, Duke Watson each rush for 2 TDs, Louisville gets 5 turnovers in 41-14 rout of Kentucky
Iranian and Chinese archaeologists collaborate on Masuleh highlands excavations
Second Cup dumps Jewish General Hospital franchisee over video with ‘hateful remarks’The Game continues to live up to expectations as one of college football's greatest rivalry games. But, unfortunately for Ohio State, Michigan will have bragging rights for another year after the Wolverines fourth consecutive win on Saturday. Ryan Day and the Buckeyes entered the game at 10-1 with a spot in the Big Ten Championship Game potentially on the line. On the other side, first-year head coach Sherrone Moore and the Wolverines were looking for a bright spot in the midst of a five-loss season. Despite having one of the most-talented rosters in the sport, the Buckeyes couldn't get past mistakes by quarterback Will Howard. The senior threw two interceptions and completed just 19-of-33 passes with one touchdown. But it wasn't all on the Kansas State transfer, as Ohio State's dominant ground game was stuffed by the Michigan front. Star running backs Quinshon Judkins and TreVeyon Henderson combined for just 67 yards rushing on 22 carries. While Michigan's offense was equally as disappointing, totaling just 234 yards, the Wolverines' ground game found success with 172 yards. Kalel Mullings shouldered the load with 116 yards and a touchdown on 32 carries. Even with two interceptions from Michigan quarterback Davis Warren, the Wolverines stunned Ohio State at home, 13-10, on a game-winning field goal by Dominic Zvada. Adam Cairns/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images Chaos ensued after the game went final. As Michigan players attempted to plan a UM flag on the Ohio State logo at midfield, the two teams got into a major brawl that ended with police officers using pepper spray on multiple players. That moment will be remembered for years to come and only adds to the drama in a series that dates back to 1897. However, the Wolverines took another subtle shot at their rivals in a social media post after the midfield frenzy was sorted out. 〽️〽️〽️〽️ https://t.co/hmA8IauI6B Michigan moves to 7-5 with the win on Saturday. In what was previously viewed as a major disappointment, the Wolverines are going bowling with another win over the Buckeyes under their belts. For Ohio State, there is still a potential Big Ten championship birth on the line as the Buckeyes await the outcomes of Penn State-Maryland and Indiana-Purdue. Even if Ryan Day and company fail to reach the conference title game, a spot in the playoff is likely secured. Related: Sherrone Moore’s Gesture in Final Moments of Michigan-Ohio State5 Savvy Ways to Use Your Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) This Season
