casino live tv
SAN DIEGO — The deployment of military troops to the southwestern border is nothing new. Presidents both Republican and Democrat have called on military support in San Diego and elsewhere many times over the years to assist with border security tasks, from surveillance to reinforcing barriers. But President-elect Donald Trump’s hint this past week that he may use armed forces to carry out mass deportations could veer into new territory. Trump signaled his plans in response to a social media post by the president of the conservative Judicial Watch group, who stated that the incoming Trump administration is prepared to “declare a national emergency and will use military assets” to address illegal immigration “through a mass deportation program.” Further details of how the Trump administration will do so remain unclear. The troops who have previously worked along the border have performed support background roles — often discreetly — and not in an enforcement capacity that has them interacting with migrants. The same goes for the California National Guard members who are currently deployed in San Diego. The question becomes whether Trump’s plan goes beyond that. In San Ysidro, just across the border from Tijuana, some residents still remember during the first Trump administration the spectacle that U.S. Army and Marine troops, including some from Camp Pendleton, brought to the area — even for a community used to the heavy presence of border agents. That’s when hundreds of active-duty troops were sent in 2018 to support operations along the California-Mexico border in response to the arrival of migrant caravans from Central America. “We do have a very strong Border Patrol presence,” said Mónica Delgadillo, a San Ysidro resident for over 40 years. “But the military or the National Guard was something very different.” Army personnel spent days installing concertina wire at the U.S.-Mexico fence to make it more difficult to scale and fortifying areas around the ports of entry to prevent large crowds from rushing into the U.S. They joined previously deployed National Guard members who had been maintaining Border Patrol vehicles, working in dispatch stations and manning remote video surveillance systems. The following year, amid a national emergency declaration to replace the border wall, more troops were sent to the southern border to help install wire barriers and monitor crossings. Trump also used the declaration to divert Pentagon funds to help finance the wall project. Troops were also called upon during the Biden administration to support the Department of Homeland Security as the agency dealt with the lifting in 2023 of a COVID-era policy that mostly closed the border to asylum seekers. The troops assisted with administrative and support tasks, not law enforcement activities. The Posse Comitatus Act restricts the federal military from performing civilian law enforcement duties, except where authorized by Congress. One of the statutory exceptions to the law is the Insurrection Act. Gov. Gavin Newsom has continued to deploy the California National Guard to assist with drug interdiction — primarily targeting fentanyl trafficking — at ports of entry. Recently, state officials said the agency’s counter-narcotics task force helped law enforcement partners seize more than 1.7 million pills of fentanyl in October. “This program continues to be extremely successful — providing critical support to law enforcement agencies in combating illicit drug trafficking and transnational criminal activity,” the agency said in a statement. But while the National Guard operates under the control of the governor, in certain circumstances the president has the authority to federalize the National Guard. Cal Guard officials said that deployment of National Guard forces is governed by distinct criteria for state and federal missions, and that they will “not speculate on potential changes or future missions.” Trump and his advisers have offered a few hints. Last year, Trump’s proposed deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, told The New York Times that military funds would be used to build “vast holding facilities that would function as staging centers” for immigrants as their cases progressed and they waited to be flown to other countries. He went further in a radio interview , proposing calling on “red state governors” and asking for their National Guards: “We will deputize them as immigration enforcement officers. They know their states, they know their communities, they know their cities.” Trump has also vowed to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to “target and dismantle every migrant criminal network operating on American soil.” Lee Gelernt, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney who spearheaded the legal challenge in San Diego to Trump’s policy of separating migrant families at the border, said that use of the military to carry out deportation under such law “is flatly illegal.” “The law requires an invasion by a foreign government, which is why it’s only been used previously during declared wars with foreign enemies,” he said in a statement. Shawn VanDiver, a Navy veteran and co-founder of the San Diego chapter of the Truman National Security Project, called the plan to use the military to address civilians “outrageous.” “We are not a country that has the military running through the streets interacting with our civilians,” he said. “That’s just not a thing. In San Diego, we have a lot of military here, but they are our neighbors. And our neighbors here know that, like they can use their own eyes and see, that we don’t have this massive crisis that’s been fabricated in people’s eyes.” Migrant encounters between ports of entry along the U.S.-Mexico border have dropped by more than 55% since President Joe Biden issued an executive order restricting asylum in June, according to Customs and Border Protection data. As of 2022, the most recent year for which federal and Pew Research Center estimates are available, there were about 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States. About 1.8 million of them were living in California. During a recent visit to San Diego, retired Mexican ambassador Martha Bárcena, who served as Mexico’s ambassador to the United States during the Trump administration, said it would be “irresponsible” to think that proposals like mass deportations were merely campaign promises. But she said she expects many of Trump’s policies to be challenged in court. ©2024 The San Diego Union-Tribune. Visit sandiegouniontribune.com . Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Omdia Forecasts Small and Medium-sized OLED Shipments to Exceed 1 Billion Units for the First Time in 2025The "Two Heavy" refers to the development of advanced manufacturing and modern agriculture, which are key pillars of China's economic transformation. By providing financial support through the national bond arrangement, the government aims to enhance the competitiveness of these industries, upgrade their technology and equipment, and optimize their production processes. This will not only boost the overall productivity and efficiency of these sectors but also create new opportunities for job creation and economic prosperity.AEW Rampage’s ratings and audience rose following last week’s preemption-enforced low. Friday’s show garnered a 0.04 rating in the 18 – 49 demographic and 177,000 viewers per Wrestlenomics . Those numbers were up a tick and 40.5% from the previous week’s 0.03 demo rating and audience of 126,000. While those numbers were up from last week’s Saturday episode that was up against Survivor Series, the demo rating was the lowest for the show’s regular timeslot. The total audience was the lowest in the timeslot since the November 1st episode brought in 172,000 viewers. Rampage was up against the UNLV vs. Boise State game on FOX (0.70 demo rating, 3.005 million viewers) and the AAC Championship game on ABC (0.28/1.991 million) Rampage is averaging a 0.098 demo rating and 300,000 viewers in 2024 to date, compared to a 0.117 demo rating and 380,000 for the same point in 2023.
The New England Patriots dropped their Week 12 matchup against the Miami Dolphins 34-15 on Sunday at Hard Rock Stadium to fall to 3-9 on the season. It was no secret that New England's 2024 campaign was going to be a rebuilding year, as it's the first under new head coach Jerod Mayo and new executive vice president of player personnel Eliot Wolf. With both men promoted to new roles for this year, it's been a widely held belief that they're both guaranteed a second season, but the loss to the Dolphins may be a perfect example of why that shouldn't be the case. On Sunday, it was clear that the Patriots don't have the talent anywhere close to the level of even the second-best team in their own division. And, while Bill Belichick left the cupboard bare, Wolf entered last offseason with a ton of money and high draft picks in each round. What did Wolf do with it? He brought in two right tackles, Chukwuma Okorafor (no longer on the team) and Caedan Wallace (a rookie), to play on the left side. His other notable free agent moves included signing linebacker Sione Takitaki (who hasn't looked overly impressive) and wide receiver K.J. Osborn (who has been a healthy scratch the last two weeks). Wolf may have drafted Drake Maye, but his rookie class outside of the first-round quarterback, has been a dud. Wide receivers Ja'Lynn Polk and Javon Baker aren't making an impact on offense, guard Layden Robinson has been benched, Wallace is on injured reserve, quarterback Joe Milton III has been the team's emergency third quarterback and Marcellas Dial is strictly a special teams contributor. He also re-signed Kyle Dugger, Christian Barmore, David Andrews, Rhamondre Stevenson, Jabrill Peppers, Davon Godchaux and Brenden Schooler. Dugger and Stevenson have taken steps backward this year while David Andrews and Christian Barmore missed significant time due to injuries/health conditions, and Jabrill Peppers is on the NFL's commissioner's exempt list. So, Wolf nailed the one pick he had to, but it didn't take a genius to decide to take Maye in the first round when they desperately needed a quarterback. Beyond that, his moves have been uninspiring and have set up Mayo in a bad spot. However, that doesn't excuse the coach for what his team is doing. The penalties are unbelievable, and they're a persistent problem that doesn't seem to be ending any time soon. On Sunday, they were called for 13 penalties, and luckily for them, only 10 were accepted. The holdings and pass interference calls hurt, but the false starts and the issues lining up are just flat-out stupid, and yes, the talent might not be good enough, but that comes back on the coaching staff. Mayo spent his entire playing career and his entire coaching career, until now, working for Bill Belichick, and while those under Belichick's tree shouldn't try to be him, they should still keep some of the marks of a Belichick team, including not making avoidable mistakes or playing sound defense. Even the coaching decisions on Mayo's part are questionable. Like on Sunday, when he decided to throw a challenge flag on a play that the Patriots had a penalty called on them. So, even if the Jaylen Waddle catch is overturned and ruled an incompletion, Miami still would've moved the ball due to defensive holding on Marcus Jones. These are the marks of an inexperienced front office, coaching staff and roster. From top to bottom, the whole system is flawed, and that's why Robert Kraft shouldn't have everyone guaranteed to return in 2025. There are growing pains with any new regime, but it shouldn't look like this. They weren't set up to look like this. And, before things get too far out of hand, and something happens to screw up Maye's development or limit him in any way, Kraft needs to be sure that this is the pair that he wants. They have the quarterback, but the wrong people above him could waste it all. MORE PATRIOTS NEWS Patriots vs. Dolphins: Instant analysis from the loss Christian Gonzalez scores Patriots first’ fumble-return TD of the year Patriots rookie QB makes an incredible play for first TD vs. Miami Patriots lose linebacker to injury vs. DolphinsIn conclusion, the restart of 737 MAX production at Boeing signifies a new chapter for the company and its flagship aircraft. Despite the challenges and controversies of the past, Boeing is committed to upholding the highest standards of safety, quality, and innovation in its aircraft manufacturing operations. The resumption of production is a testament to Boeing's resilience, adaptability, and unwavering dedication to excellence in the aerospace industry.
- Previous: casino live today
- Next: casino live uk
