magical sea view studio torremolinos

magical sea view studio torremolinos Ohio State QB Will Howard Issues Public Apology After Losing to MichiganThis Timberwolves roster is different than the one from a year ago. That much is obvious in games, as Karl-Anthony Towns’ consistent scoring and general size is missed, as is the playmaking and ball security of guys like Kyle Anderson and Jordan McLaughlin. ADVERTISEMENT But their absences have been felt in the locker room, as well. Towns was a consistent source of positivity for the team. Anderson was one of the loudest vocal leaders. The latter can be especially difficult to replace, especially because it can be uncomfortable to speak up when things are going poorly and something needs to change. That was the position Anthony Edwards has found himself in early this season. Edwards has been praised for his leadership through his first four years on Minnesota’s roster. Mostly, that all came via positivity and example. Edwards can be coached hard, which gave the greenlight for the coaches to treat everyone else the same way. Edwards was also quick to credit his teammates around him for their contributions to the cause, and was eager and willing to spend time with and talk to anyone on the roster, players No. 1-15. He’ll also stand up for any of his teammates if the occasion ever arises. That’s why he has been so beloved in the locker room and why he was viewed as such a leader, even at his young age. ADVERTISEMENT But with Anderson’s departure, Edwards was now tasked with leading even through choppy waters. And the waves have been rather large through the first quarter of the season. Minnesota’s defense has fallen off a cliff in comparison to where it was a year ago. After never even as many as three consecutive games during the 2023-24 regular season, the Wolves endured a four-game losing skid earlier this week. At that point, words were exchanged, both publicly and privately. A halftime hash out during Minnesota’s loss Wednesday to Sacramento got the conversation rolling. Mike Conley got the dialogue started, but all indications are that Edwards was a healthy participant. Edwards noted it’s difficult to know what to say in those times. “Because you look at everybody, and everybody got a different agenda. It’s like, ‘What the (heck) am I supposed to say?’ You know what I mean?” Edwards said. “I’m trying to get better in that aspect, figure out what the hell to say to get everybody on the same agenda, because everybody right now is on different agendas. I think that’s one of the main culprits of why we’re losing, because everybody out there got their own agenda. I guess their imagination of what’s supposed to be going on, and what’s really happening.” Nickeil Alexander-Walker told reporters at Friday’s shootaround that this is the most vocal Edwards has ever been. And while the intention of everyone’s messages are pure, “sometimes it’s not always worded the right way.” ADVERTISEMENT “I think we’ve crossed that line of, ‘Man, I feel like you’re not hearing the message.’ It’s tough to be called out, because you start to feel like, ‘OK, are you saying I’m the reason?’ No one wants to be at fault,” Alexander-Walker said. “But at the end of the day, I definitely think that guys are open to hearing it better. And I think it just came from a stand point of, at a point and time in the conversation, there was a comeback. It was going back and forth now, as opposed to receiving it (and saying), ‘OK, I got you.’ That’s how it’s going to be. It’s very rare that someone is just going to be able to be called out and not have anything to say. “It’s human nature to be defensive, at the end of the day. But kind of remembering what we’re here for, and if I’m being called out, chances are I’ve got to look in the mirror and be better.” It’s a delicate dance. There has to be an environment rooted in accountability, but you also have to be sure not to lose teammates, as Jimmy Butler was criticized for doing during his short stint in Minnesota a few years ago. ADVERTISEMENT And while it’s never ideal for a team to be living through a stretch of basketball the quality of which falls significantly short of the expectation, these stretches will likely lead to growth for Edwards, if not on the court, then in the locker room. You can’t steer a ship to a title if you don’t know how to navigate turbulent tides. Day by day, loss by loss, Edwards is learning how to spin the wheel. ______________________________________________________ This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here .

The Gophers football program has added a second receiver commitment in two days via the NCAA transfer portal. Nebraska transfer Malachi Coleman pledged to Minnesota on Tuesday and will have three years of eligibility at the U. ADVERTISEMENT “Let’s rock,” he posted on social media. Coleman was a top 70 recruit in the nation out of Lincoln (Neb.) East in the class of 2023, but didn’t play much in 2024. Listed at 6-foot-4 and 190 pounds, Coleman played in only one game in 2024, using his redshirt season. As a true freshman in 2023, Coleman had eight receptions for 139 yards and one touchdown. In 2023, he received an average grade out 58.0 by Pro Football Focus and was primarily a split receiver for 332 out of 335 total offensive snaps. Coleman follows two other wideouts to Minnesota: Logan Loya (UCLA) on Monday and Jaovn Tracy (Miami of Ohio) on Dec. 15. ______________________________________________________ This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here .As the parliamentary year draws to a close, with speculation that an election will be called as early as March next year, a burning question comes to mind. Just what has been the point of the Albanese government? In two and a half years, interest rates have increased 12 times, meaning that mortgage repayments are 62 per cent higher than when the Albanese government came into office. For the past six quarters in a row, GDP per capita growth has been negative, the worst result in 50 years. It’s impossible for young people to get into the housing market, with record immigration levels meaning that housing supply is nowhere near keeping up with demand. Underlying inflation figures – the number once government subsidies are taken out of the equation – released this week show that groceries, rent, gas, insurance, among other things, are more expensive, meaning an interest rate cut won’t be coming any time soon. Power bills, rather than coming down by the much-vaunted $275, have increased close to four times that, thanks in no small part to Chris Bowen’s insane ideological crusade on weather-dependent wind and solar power. The cat was belled on this last week when Frontier Economics released a report that revealed the cost of building a renewable-only power grid is more than $500 billion higher than what the Albanese government has claimed. As we head into summer, this supposedly first world country is being told that the electricity system we have can no longer cope with heatwaves and risks blackouts if we turn on air-conditioners during 40C days. In Australia, 40C days mean a normal summer and I should be able to turn the air-conditioner on if I need to. AEMO invoked emergency energy powers to avoid blackouts. If a first world country cannot supply enough electricity for times when there is peak demand, well, as Chris Uhlmann put it, we are on a pathway to poverty while Bowen and his cronies conduct an experiment with the most essential of services, and destroying arable land and forests in doing so. And while the rest of the world at COP29 decides to press ahead with the reliable, safe, affordable and emissions free nuclear option, Bowen gives the proverbial middle finger to our AUKUS partners in developing the same nuclear energy that will power submarines to be used on land. Treasurer Jim Chalmers, after last year’s $15.8 billion surplus – thanks to soaring tax collections from mining companies who the government demonises – will manage to turn that into deficit of $33.5 billion this financial year, according to Deloitte Access Economics. In fact, Deloitte predicts the deficit will grow in 2025-26 to $46.8 billion, $6 billon worse than Treasury projections and this is driven in no small part by government spending, which as Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock pointed out, is adding fuel to the inflation fire. Not content with saddling this and future generations of taxpayers with increasing interest repayments – money that could have been used to fund schools, hospitals and roads – Chalmers now thinks he can direct the Future Fund (which pays military and public service pensions) no longer to choose investments based on the best possible return to taxpayers, but on what’s in the Albanese government’s best electoral interest. Chalmers claims this move will not jeopardise returns, but, as anyone with a modicum of economic common sense knows, if investment options are limited, the capacity for a return is also limited. It is nothing short of irresponsible. Add to all this the workplace legislation changes that, as this column recently highlighted, impose a substantial economic cost on small to medium business – many of them family business. And just this week the government passed legislation to forgive student HECS debt by 20 per cent. Those who stand to benefit most from this pathetic attempt to buy votes are law and medicine students, meaning that hardworking Australians who have never been to university will be subsidising those who will be earning a motzer once they get into the workforce. Former US President Bill Clinton’s advisers had a simple strategy based on the dictum: “It’s the economy, stupid.” It seems Albanese and Co can only recall the “stupid” part, for the economic well-being of Australians has been sacrificed on the altar of pet activist projects such as the Voice, which sucked up 18 months and nearly half a billion dollars. And when the result was not what Albanese wanted, he blames it on “misinformation” and tries to introduce legislation to silence people that spread “false, misleading or deceptive information about ... referendum proposals, elections, public health, the economy”, among other things. Albanese’s equivocation following the October 7 atrocities, while at the same time decrying “Islamophobia”, having his Foreign Minister support a UN motion for a permanent Palestinian state and Albanese remaining silent on the ICC issuing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant, show a lack of moral conviction, if not moral relativism. His government’s removal of temporary protection visas means illegal boat arrivals have started again, and its incompetence in dealing with detainees following the High Court’s NZYQ decision led to the bashing of Perth grandmother Ninette Simons. I could go on. Our high school history teacher told us that: “It doesn’t matter where you come from, as long as you know where you are going.” The Albanese government’s priorities are askew. His “I grew up in social housing raised by a single mother” routine is no substitute for leadership. On any measure, Australia is going backwards at a rate of knots. After just two and a half years, is it any wonder that this government is being considered worse than Whitlam. Dr Rocco Loiacono is a legal academic, writer and translator. Earlier in his career, he spent a decade practicing as a lawyer with Clayton Utz, one of Australia’s top law firms. As well as SkyNews.com.au, he regularly contributes opinion pieces, specialising in politics, freedom and the rule of law, to The Daily Telegraph, The Herald Sun and The Australian

Russia security chief meets Taleban officials

Notable quotes by Jimmy Carter

Sydney Swans coach John Longmire is expected to step down from his role despite having one year to run on his contract, according to multiple reports on Tuesday. Longmire has been at the helm of the Swans since 2011, and won the 2012 premiership with the club. He also made Grand Finals in 2014, 2016, 2022, and this past season in 2024. Despite a 1-4 record in Grand Finals, Longmire is one of the most successful coaches of the modern era, boasting a winning percentage of 62.9% from 333 games in charge (208-3-122). 's Tom Morris and 's Mitch Clearly have bnoth reported Longmire will tell the Swans' playing group he will step down, with assistant Dean Cox highly likely to take the reins. Cox turned down the West Coast Eagles head coaching role when it was open earlier in the year. The Swans have scheduled a press conference for a "major club announcement" today at 1:30pm.NoneHow Rosalynn Carter shaped Jimmy Carter's presidency, volunteerism

“Happy Halloween!” Cher booms down the phone. As I recompose myself and a moment of silence follows, she adds, with a touch of knowing glee: “Did I give you a fright?” I’m not exactly frightened, but hearing that sonorous voice say my name back to me—a voice I’ve heard my entire life on the radio, on the TV, and in my head every time I read one of her Tweets—does feel a little surreal. After all, stars may come and go, but there’s only ever been one Cher. As one of the world’s greatest entertainers, her career has spanned six decades and half a dozen disciplines; she’s been garlanded with everything from an Oscar to a Grammy to the best actress prize at Cannes Film Festival, and feted by the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame for her music, GLAAD for her activism, and the CFDA for her often imitated (but never duplicated) eye for fashion. She’s resuscitated her career more times than you can even count, from a boho folk-rock countercultural icon, to a leather-clad rock chick, to an acclaimed actor, to an imperious disco diva. (As the saying goes, if there’s a nuclear war, only two species are likely to survive: cockroaches and Cher.) What those many transformations speak to, though, is not just Cher’s remarkable knack for reinvention, but her extraordinary resilience: a quality that has never been captured with the same candor and scope as her rip-roaring, deliciously readable new memoir, titled, simply, The Memoir: Part One . (The book has been split into two parts, with the first half out now, and the second arriving in 2025—because, as Cher’s publishers HarperCollins succinctly put it: “It’s a life too immense for only one book.” Well, quite.) Yet despite the forensic eye for detail you’ll find within the book’s pages, it was a long and meandering journey to getting her story down with the honesty it truly required. “Truthfully, I started work on it at least two times, maybe even three,” Cher explains. “But I always thought, ‘You know what? If you’re going to write this book, you’ve got to tell more.’” The book offers a bracingly candid account of Cher’s turbulent, itinerant childhood: Her neglectful father deserted the family for heroin and other women, while her glamorous mother struggled to make ends meet while constantly moving around the country, and was even—in a particularly devastating chapter—forced to deposit Cher at a Baptist orphanage in Scranton for an extended period while working shifts in an all-night diner at the other end of the city. We follow Cher through her teenage years (and a brief dalliance with Warren Beatty), her relationship with Sonny Bono, and their rapid ascent to fame, her path criss-crossing with a dazzling cast of 1960s and ’70s pop culture icons. There are the highs of motherhood and the lows of abusive relationships, with Bono’s suffocating cruelty in the final years of her relationship even leading her to consider suicide. There is the promise of reinvention , as the book ends with Cher catching up with her old friend Francis Ford Coppola in her dressing room at Caesar’s Palace, considering her first leap into the world of cinema. And for fashion fans, there are also some fascinating insights into her rise as a style icon, from her first time meeting Bob Mackie at a fitting for an appearance on The Carol Burnett Show, to her memories of working with Diana Vreeland on her string of Vogue covers in the 1970s. But the constant through it all? Cher’s unmistakable voice, which rings out, loud and clear, from every sentence: her compassion, her wisdom, her heart, and, of course, her bone-dry sense of humor. Here, Cher talks to Vogue about her journey to writing the memoir, why the chapters on abortion and reproductive rights feel more timely than ever, and how she gets dressed for a Halloween party. (Especially when there’s a decent chance you’ll run into someone dressed as you. ) We also spoke in the days leading up to the U.S. presidential election—and Cher’s insight was, as ever, exceedingly prescient. Vogue: Good morning, Cher! Where am I finding you at this hour? Cher: You’re finding me sitting on my bed, looking at the ocean, trying to decide which Halloween party I’m going to go to tonight. So you have multiple options? I have a few, yes. My goddaughter is throwing one. I don’t go to a lot of parties, but I expect this will be fun because her friends are fun. It’s going to be great. And then, tomorrow night we’re going to a Universal party, and it’s Halloween Horror Night, so I’m excited about that. When did you first start working on your memoir, and what prompted you to begin writing it? I don’t know exactly what prompted me, but I started work on it a long, long time ago. I quickly realized there were a few things that I didn’t want in there. Truthfully, I started work on it at least two times, maybe even three, but I always thought, “You know what? If you’re going to write this book, you’ve got to tell more.” And in the beginning, I just didn’t want to. Then eventually, I realized, “Oh, well, who cares?” What was it that you were reluctant to share? Or that you were struggling to get down on the page? I truly can’t remember the individual things, because once I started writing, I just started writing. But there were moments in the beginning where I thought, I don’t want to go there. I thought too, I won’t be able to explain certain things about my relationships—how could I do that? I was really concerned. There’s a remarkable level of detail in the chapters about your childhood. Was that all plumbed from your own memories, or did you talk to others who were there at the time to piece it together? Well, my mom always told me things from my childhood, but she also left out some important things. As a teenager, or even as a child, you don’t hop a freight train if you’re not... different. [ Laughs. ] So I think my mom was ready for it. But my grandmother? When I was in my early 30s, she came backstage one night when I was getting ready to go on, and she arrived with a high chair that had Bambi on it and said, “When you lived with us, this was your high chair.” And then my grandmother started telling me these stories, and I just thought, Oh, my God. I thought, Whatever I feel, I have an audience out there waiting, and I just don’t have time to feel this now. I’ll feel it later. The first part of the book charts the story of your childhood and your ascent to fame, and you’re very candid about the challenges you faced. Was it difficult to revisit that period of your life? No. I mean, not like you think it would be. It’s pragmatic. It was what it was. While I was doing it, I didn’t like it too much, but it was also... we were in such a time crunch [back then] that we were working constantly—many, many, many hours a day with no days off. It started to irritate my psyche. Did you feel any kind of weight off your shoulders after getting it down on the page? Was it therapeutic in any sense? I don’t know. I’m not sure. To be honest, I just don’t know. Fair enough. I wanted to ask you about the opening of the book, with you watching Elvis on TV as a kid. Why did that feel like such a formative moment for you? Well, musically, I just thought everybody sang all the time. My mom and my grandfather, and my uncle, we sang all the time. And when I saw Elvis, when I heard him—and my mother and I both loved him, which I think was great because my girlfriends were jealous, because most of their mothers were appalled—when my mom took me to see him, it was a huge turning point in my life because I just thought, that’s what I want to be. I want to be him. Your voice is very present in the book in a way I was surprised by and enjoyed. There are a lot of Cher-isms in there: describing a childhood home as a “funky-ass log cabin” and sprinkling in a few WTFs here and there... What do you mean? I suppose... I know what you just said, but what do you actually mean? I guess that it’s not written like a... stuffy, old-fashioned biography. Well, I do say it was very Dickensian at some point. You did. And it is Dickensian, in many ways. It was what it was. It was what it was, and you just live it. When you’re busy living it, and something happens, you go, ‘Oh God.’ But then when you think back on it, maybe it wasn’t so hard. I think what I was trying to get at is that your sense of humor always feels woven into the story, even during some of the darkest periods of your life. Has humor always helped you confront those more difficult moments? Well, usually with the “What the fuck?” part. Really, it's like, “What were these people thinking?” Because really, What were these people thinking? Weren’t they ashamed of themselves? I do think though, my God, I’m so lucky. I had such a cool life. Even if it was difficult, it was really interesting. And maybe people will love it or hate it. [ Pauses. ] I don’t think l could describe it as either loving or hating it... Were you gobsmacked? [ Laughs. ] I was! But I was also very moved. A huge part of it is you recounting the story of your mother considering an abortion when she was pregnant with you. I know it’s a subject you’ve spoken about before, but the grace you held around the choices your mom was facing in that moment felt very powerful, and timely. I didn't really think about... actually no, I think about that all the time. I think about how we have gone so backwards, and God knows where it’s going to end because I have no idea. You know things happen in your life, and you make some peace with them. I’m a little bit strange when it comes to those things. You have good times and you have bad times, and you can’t control either one. Reproductive rights are at the forefront of the political conversation—a conversation you’ve been very outspoken about throughout your entire career. How are you feeling right now? Scared to death. What do you think I’m feeling? I don’t know how far back we’re going to go, but I think we will go back in every area where we’ve made progress, and it scares me to death because this is going to be a bumpy ride. I know that’s very American, but that’s how it feels. It’s the scariest thing that’s happened in my lifetime. And we’re going to go backwards in every way we’ve made progress. We’re going to go back so much farther than we made the progress from. Do you know what I mean? I don’t even know how to explain my feelings about it. I’m terrified. I was also really struck by your observational writing throughout the book. I loved the weird details you picked out from the milieu of friends that surrounded your mom when you were growing up in Hollywood, and the clothes they wore. Well, my mom and her friends, these women were some of the most beautiful women I ever saw, and have ever seen. I think my mom was the poorest of them all, but even though she didn’t have money, she would save and save and save and buy one dress that she could wear that was fashion-forward and looked beautiful. All of my mother’s friends were so beautiful, and so... gracious but funky, balls to the wall. Fashion and makeup were a huge part of my life, and I was always so interested in watching these women put on their clothes and high heels. And it wasn’t Andy Hardy and it wasn’t Father Knows Best it was something that didn’t exist. Kind of like Sonny and I! That fashion didn’t exist until we started it. You might not have liked it, but it was fashion. Completely. Your looks with Sonny were pivotal in defining what the idea of fashion means, and it was one of the first proper, 360-degree youth pop cultural phenomena. I loved reading about how people responded to you arriving in London. They were all obsessed because they’d never seen anyone dressed like that before. In America, it was terrible. It was terrible! And the moment we got to London, it was amazing. We went to a candy store, and we walked in, and there was an old lady behind the register, and she took out her autograph book and said, “Could I have your autograph?” And I just stood there, and I was confounded, because people at home, the grown-ups, really didn’t like us at all. They were afraid and appalled at the way we looked. England was the beginning. Without coming there, without Great Britain, I’m not sure we would’ve existed. You also write in the book about your first shoots for Vogue and how exciting that was. Do those memories still resonate with you today? That was all due to Mrs. Vreeland. She was such a forward thinker and none of the girls that she put in there were thought of as beautiful or model-like, or... we were strange, but it turned out to be fabulous, because she brought a whole new world into Vogue. And how does it feel at this point, knowing the book is going to be in readers’ hands in just a few weeks after having worked on it for so many years? Well, I don’t know what’s going to actually happen. People that I talk to seem to like it and seem to be surprised. And I think that what I tried to do more than anything was present stories, not information because you could go anywhere to get information, but stories are hard to come by. Stories have to come from the person. I hope you have a great Halloween, also. Have you decided what you’re going to dress up as? I don’t know. I was just thinking about that, actually. I was thinking about makeup and doing something like a beautiful vampire or skull—a beautiful skull. But I have no idea. I just thought of those things because I want to be interesting. I don’t want to try to be like myself. I don’t want to be Cher. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.FORT WORTH — With seconds remaining and a decision to be made, Oklahoma head coach Brent Venables made no hesitation — he wanted to go for the win. “We made that decision earlier in the drive,” he said. “Liked our look, liked our opportunities there.” The Sooners (6-7) lined up for a two-point conversion attempt, but would be stopped by Navy (10-3) in the game’s final moments as the Midshipmen held on for the 21-20 win Friday at the 2024 Lockheed Martin Armed Forces Bowl at Texas Christian University. “We got exactly what we thought we were going to get,” Venables said. “And we’ve worked hard in that situation all year long...we knew if (the game) was under 30 seconds, we were going to go for two.” And Navy head coach Brian Newberry agreed with the Sooners' offensive call. “They had momentum right there and struggled after scoring 14,” Newberry said. “I thought that was the right decision, I think I would have done the same thing.” The Sooners struck first in their opening drive, using the legs of Michael Hawkins and Gavin Sawchuk to power for 45 of the 65-yard march — with Sawchuk barreling into the end zone for the 21-yard score. “Gavin (Sawchuk) started off really hot and did well early." Venables said. “We played all four backs, and they all touched the ball.” After a defensive stop, Oklahoma took back over possession. With Hawkins scrambling and changing directions on a broken play, he connected with Zion Kearney with a dime for the 56-yard touchdown and 14-0 lead after the first quarter. “He was really good, great rhythm early and late,” Venables said of Hawkins, who finished the day with 247 passing yards and 61 rushing yards. The Midshipmen defense held strong on a fourth-down stop deep into its own territory to take over possession early in the second quarter, but the Sooners returned the favor to force a Navy punt — with the Midshipmen pinning OU on its own eight-yard line. Sooners rolled to midfield, but it’d be Navy with another fourth-down stand to take back over on the OU 45. The Midshipmen capitalized on the opportunity, with Alex Tecza punching it in and putting Navy on the board and leading to a 14-7 OU lead at the half. “We just came out pretty strong. Second quarter we got a little relaxed and didn’t take what they gave us,” Hawkins said. “We weren’t together as a team. Going into a game like this, you have to be together.” After a defensive start for most of the third quarter, it’d be Navy’s Blake Horvath breaking things open — faking out the defense for the longest run in school history at 95 yards to tie up the game. Horvath, who finished the day with 155 rushing yards, said he was just as surprised as anyone else that he pulled off the feat. “Plenty of guys faster than me,” he joked. “But it wouldn’t be the longest without Brant Chatman and the offensive line.” The Midshipmen weren’t done yet, forcing a fumble and recovery at the Sooner 26. But a missed Navy field goal attempt gave Oklahoma the ball once more on their own 21. The Sooners would take the drive into the fourth quarter, but a 52-yard field goal attempt went right of the posts to keep the game even with 12:06 to play. Navy burned up the clock as it churned down the field, with Horvath capping off a 66-yard drive with a six-yard rushing score to give the Midshipmen their first lead of the game with 4:34 remaining. The Sooners wasted no time in working their way down the field. It’d be Hawkins throwing a dart to Jake Roberts in the right corner of the end zone with six seconds left. OU opted to go for the win with its two-point conversion try — but the Midshipmen defense held on to seal the victory. Venables said he took full responsibility for not only the game, but the roller coaster of a season as a whole. “Everything falls on me. When we’re dropping it and not converting fourth down, giving up explosive runs, everything falls at my feet,” he said. “Really disappointed in myself. I need to be a lot better. We went 6-7 and we did a lot of things right, but we have to be a lot better.” But despite everything, he also expressed immense pride in his team’s fight and how they represented their school. “I am hurt for the players because I know they’ve worked hard. Its easy to take shots at the coaches, but everyone is disappointed,” Venables said. “I am not embarrassed of the fight, commitment and the work that these guys have represented. We have to be better. This is a game of performance and work, and we fell short of that this year.” And as tight end Jake Roberts said, adrenaline and emotion flashing across his face, he’s proud of the work put in by he and his teammates — and excited for the future of Oklahoma football. “Obviously it’s not the year we wanted to have. Obviously a lot of disappointment but a ton of growth. Learn how to come back to work when you don’t want to,” he said. “Although it’s disappointing, not going to say I would change anything. I’m excited to see what Team 131 does. You take the adversity, you learn from it and move on.”Stock market today: Wall Street slips as technology stocks drag on the market

Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is Mizuho Markets Cayman LP’s Largest Position

PLAINS, Georgia (AP) — Newly married and sworn as a Naval officer, left his tiny hometown in 1946 hoping to climb the ranks and see the world. The untimely death of his father, a farmer who went by “Mr. Earl,” brought the submariner and his wife, , back to a rural life they thought they’d escaped. The lieutenant would never be an admiral. Instead, he became commander in chief. And, years after his presidency ended in humbling defeat, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate. The life of James Earl Carter Jr. ended Sunday where it began. Plains fueled the rise of the 39th U.S. president, welcomed him after his fall and sustained him during 40 years of service as a global humanitarian. With an optimism rooted in Baptist faith and an engineer’s stubborn confidence, Carter showed a missionary zeal to solve problems and improve lives. “We shouldn’t judge presidents by how popular they are in their day,” Carter biographer Jonathan Alter told The Associated Press. “We should judge them by how they changed the country and the world for the better. On that score, Jimmy Carter is not in the first rank of American presidents, but he stands up quite well.” Many Americans judged his presidency ineffective for failing to end an energy crisis, turn around the economy or quickly bring American hostages home from Tehran. He won widespread admiration instead for The Carter Center — which has advocated for , human rights and democracy since 1982 — and the many years he and Rosalynn swung hammers with . Carter’s allies relished that he and Rosalynn, who died Nov. 19, 2023, lived to see . “He doesn’t quite fit in today’s terms” of a left-right, red-blue scoreboard, said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a repeat visitor during his own White House bid. Carter labeled himself “progressive” or “conservative.” Republicans cast him as a left-wing cartoon. He could be classified a centrist, Buttigieg told the AP, “but there’s also something radical about the depth of his commitment to looking after those who are left out of society and out of the economy.” Carter’s vow to restore America’s virtue after the shame of Vietnam and Watergate with a transparent, good-government approach didn’t suit Republicans who cast government as the problem. His efficiency mandate could put him at odds with Democrats. Still, he scored wins on the environment, education and ; expanded federally protected lands; began deregulating air travel, railroads and trucking; ; and unlike later presidents, added a relative pittance to the national debt. Carter had , grinning enthusiastically and promising he would “never lie” to them. Once in Washington, he could seem like a joyless engineer, insisting that political rewards would follow facts and logic. Such tenacity worked well at Camp David as Carter brokered peace between Israel’s Menachem Begin and Egypt’s Anwar Sadat, but it failed him as the nation’s cheerleader, beseeching Americans to get past a “crisis of confidence.” Republican Ronald Reagan exploited Carter’s lecturing tone, saying “there you go again” in response to a wonky debate answer. “The Great Communicator” won all but six states. Carter later acknowledged an incompatibility with Washington insiders who looked down on his team as “country come to town.” His closest adviser was Rosalynn Carter, who joined his Cabinet meetings. When she urged him to postpone relinquishing the Panama Canal, Carter said he was “going to do what’s right” even if meant he wouldn’t get re-elected, recalled her aide, Kathy Cade. “She’d remind him you have to win to govern,” Cade said. Carter won by navigating divides on race, class and ideology. He offered himself as an outsider to Atlanta and Washington, a peanut farmer with a nickname who carried his own luggage. in a home without running water or electricity, he was raised by a progressive mother and racist father. He and Rosalynn privately supported integration in the 1950s, but he didn’t push to desegregate schools, and there’s no record of him supporting the 1965 Voting Rights Act as a state senator. Carter ran to the right of his rival to then landed on the cover of Time magazine by declaring that “the time for racial discrimination is over.” He didn’t befriend civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.’s family until he ran for president. “He very shrewdly took advantage of his own Southernness,” said Amber Roessner, a University of Tennessee professor who wrote a book on Carter’s campaign. Carter was the last Democratic nominee to sweep the Deep South. Then, as he did in Georgia, he used his power as president to appoint more nonwhites than all his predecessors had, combined. Many years later, Carter called it “inconceivable” that he didn’t consult Rosalynn before moving their family back to Plains or launching his state Senate bid. He called the mother of their four children in government and at The Carter Center as well as at home. “I just loved it,” she said of campaigning, despite the bitterness of defeat. True or not, the label of a failed presidency had for many years. Carter remained relevant as a freelance diplomat, writing more than 30 books and weighing in on societal challenges. Carter declared after Donald Trump’s presidential victory that But he also warned Democrats against moving too far left, lest they help re-elect him, and said many failed to understand Trump’s populist appeal. Pilgrimages to Plains became advantageous again for would-be presidents in recent years, and well into their 90s, the Carters greeted visitors at Plains’ , where he and where his last funeral will be held. In his farewell presidential address, Carter urged citizens who had embraced or rejected him to do their part as Americans. “The struggle for human rights overrides all differences of color, nation or language,” he declared. “Those who hunger for freedom, who thirst for human dignity and who suffer for the sake of justice — they are the patriots of this cause.” Carter pledged to remain engaged as he returned “home to the South where I was born and raised,” to where he had indeed become “a fellow citizen of the world.” Bill Barrow, The Associated Press