1v1 online game

2025-01-12 2025 European Cup 1v1 online game News

Article content Toyota has announced upgrades to its all-electric bZ4X for 2025, including a new mid-range trim level. The bZ4X, also the basis of the Subaru Solterra , is currently sold only in British Columbia and Quebec. While the 2024 version came as the LE in front-wheel drive (FWD) and the XLE in all-wheel drive (AWD), the new LE AWD trim slides in between them. Pricing for the 2025 bZ4X starts at $46,515 for the LE FWD; $47,016 for the new LE AWD; $51,845 for the XLE AWD; and the Technology Package takes it to $59,830. The vehicle is eligible for provincial “green” vehicle rebates in B.C. and Quebec, as well as the federal rebate . The 2025 XLE AWD model now receives a steering wheel touch-sensor system, front cross-traffic alert, and lane change assist; and its Technology Package now includes traffic jam assist, using adaptive cruise control at stop-and-go speeds. While Subaru hasn’t yet announced any changes to the Solterra for 2025, the 2024 version comes only in AWD, and in a basic trim but with available Luxury Package or Technology Package options. Seating up to five passengers, the bZ4X – a number-and-letter salad that we at Driving remember by thinking of “busy forest” – has a single electric motor in the FWD model, making 201 horsepower and 196 lb-ft of torque, and with a range of up to 406 km. The AWD trims add a second rear electric motor, with a combined rating of 214 horsepower and 248 lb-ft of torque, with a range of up to 367 km. Standard features on the LE models include a 12.3-inch touchscreen with Toyota Multimedia operating system, heated front seats with radiant foot and leg warmer, dual-zone climate control, and heated steering wheel. Driver-assist technologies include emergency front braking, adaptive cruise control, lane-keep assist, safe exit assist, and blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert. The XLE AWD adds faux-leather upholstery trim, auto-dimming mirror, panoramic sunroof, garage door opener, rear-seat charging ports, cargo cover, and rear cross-traffic braking. Its available Technology Package further adds 20-inch wheels, connectivity services, premium audio, full leather-look upholstery, heated and ventilated front seats, hands-free liftgate, roof rails, panoramic view monitor, advanced parking system, and digital key, plus the new traffic jam assist. Sign up for our newsletter Blind-Spot Monitor and follow our social channels on Instagram , Facebook and X to stay up to date on the latest automotive news, reviews, car culture, and vehicle shopping advice.The bill dictates that conciliation has to protect the overall interests of the national economy by ensuring the functioning of wage formation and labour markets. Effectively the bill would prevent trade unions from securing pay rises that exceed those agreed on in export industries through a conciliation process. While export industries have traditionally set the cap for raises in other industries, the bill would cement their status as the bellwether for collective bargaining across industries. Lauri Lyly (SDP), the deputy chairperson of the Employment and Equality Committee, described the bill in an interview with the public broadcasting company as a needless initiative that will tie the hands of conciliation authorities. It also, he added, fails to specify in sufficient detail the meaning of overall interest of the national economy. “The bill is needless because for the past 60 years the general pay-rise cap has been broken only a couple of times – and even then in the case of public-sector pay agreements,” he said. Chairperson Saara-Sofia Sirén (NCP) assured that the bill would not restrict the freedom to bargain in the labour markets as labour market organisations will be “completely free” to decide on whether or not to accept a particular settlement proposal. She added that experts heard by the committee disagreed on how the bill could impact collective bargaining: Some gauged that it would increase labour disputes, others that it would decrease them. Some gauged that it would facilitate bargaining, others that it would complicate it. The idea of officially capping pay increases to those thrashed out in export industries has drawn criticism from a range of trade unions, particularly those in female-dominated industries. They have been worried that the bill will condemn women to work forever for remuneration that falls well short of that in export industries. The Social Democratic Party views similarly that the bill would cement the gender pay gap in Finland, according to Lyly. Sirén acknowledged the gap but argued that because it stems from a pronounced division into men and women’s jobs, it should be addressed with education policy measures rather than the bill on conciliation in the labour markets. Aleksi Teivainen – HTElon Musk, never one to shy away from stirring the pot, recently declared that "cancel culture" has been "cancelled." Bold words from a man who’s no stranger to making bold statements. I admire Musk for many things — his vision, his humor, his sheer audacity, and his knack for being right about so much. But on this, he couldn’t be more wrong. Just ask the average Australian. Down under, cancel culture isn’t just alive; it’s running rampant, ready to destroy anyone who dares to step out of line. No one’s safe, and now, it seems, no day is either. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve probably heard about the parent company of more than 200 pubs in Australia banning Australia Day celebrations, before backflipping on the decision and apologising for causing “concern and confusion”. A day once meant to unite has become a battlefield, where even firing up the barbecue feels like a political act. It’s no longer just about who’s being cancelled; it’s about what we’re still permitted to celebrate — and the unsettling glee of those who take comfort in the act of cancelling. Gen Alpha Embraces Big Brother Most readers here likely stand against cancel culture, but the tide is turning with Gen Alpha, the youngest generation coming of age. Polls reveal a troubling trend. Many in this group actively support cancel culture. It’s hardly surprising when you consider their formative years were shaped by the heavy-handedness of COVID lockdowns. For them, the world has always been one of nanny-state politics, where decisions are outsourced — to ChatGPT, Google, or the endless echo chamber of social media. Validation no longer stems from critical thought or conviction but from the fleeting currency of likes, shares, and comments. Tyranny is trending. Gen Alpha, the leaders of tomorrow, have grown up in a world where cancel culture isn’t just accepted; it’s seen as a tool for justice, a way to right perceived wrongs. Many of them genuinely believe it’s a good thing. To their minds, calling out and cancelling is less about censorship and more about accountability, a moral duty to ensure the "right" voices are heard. But in their quest for progress, they risk doubling down on a society where fear overshadows freedom, where the line between justice and mob rule blurs beyond recognition. In many ways, Gen Alpha seems to suffer from a kind of Stockholm syndrome. Raised in an era of relentless oversight and performative morality, they’ve come to embrace the very forces that limit their freedom, mistaking abuse for safety. And I don’t use the word “abuse” lightly. The Australian Government already wields the power to suppress individuals or groups with alarming precision through carefully tailored legislation. By crafting laws that target specific segments of the population, it can systematically silence dissent without broad backlash. What’s even more alarming is the government’s growing power to freeze personal bank accounts — a chilling extension of cancel culture that goes far beyond silencing speech Corporate Cancel Culture Marc Andreessen, a renowned venture capitalist and close associate of Musk, recently appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast. During their three-hour conversation, he unveiled a deeply unsettling trend: the rise of debanking. This isn’t merely about closing accounts; it’s a deliberate form of erasure, targeting those deemed guilty of ideological wrongthink. Debanking, as Andreessen explained, is not an isolated occurrence but a deliberate tactic of corporate cancel culture, where financial institutions enforce conformity under the guise of promoting “safety” and “social responsibility.” The implications are, for lack of a better word, terrifying. Financial institutions, once considered neutral stewards of capital, now act as ideological enforcers. Without trial or transparency, individuals can find themselves cut off from the modern economy, their financial viability stripped away. It is a form of punishment that bypasses due process, leaving its victims with little recourse. What began as social media shaming has turned into something far more sinister. One tweet, one Facebook post, one instance of "wrongthink" on Instagram — and you could lose everything. Of course, the menace of debanking isn’t confined to America’s borders. In Australia, the same tactics are being weaponised as a means of exclusion, targeting small businesses and individuals without offering any justification. While this practice often hits industries deemed controversial — like cryptocurrency, firearms, and adult services — it also impacts legitimate sectors such as farming and mining. Requests for explanations are routinely brushed off with vague references to “business decisions”, leaving account holders in the dark. Shockingly, even family members of those targeted have faced account closures, spreading financial instability far beyond the initial target. Banks argue that anti-money laundering laws justify these actions, yet even AUSTRAC, Australia’s financial regulator, has warned that blanket account closures may actually increase risks like money laundering. Despite recommendations for greater transparency, banks remain opaque, hiding behind legal loopholes to wield unchecked power. A Reflection of Human Nature This brings us back to Musk’s premature proclamation. Cancel culture is not an entity; it’s an idea, an ideology born from petty grievances, envy, and the abuses of power by those who delight in wielding it. Nietzsche’s concept of ressentiment — the simmering bitterness of the weak and spiteful — perfectly encapsulates its essence. Cancel culture thrives on a desire to bring others down, feeding on the satisfaction of public ruin and ridicule. It’s an ideology that mutates, evading extermination because it taps into something fundamentally human. As long as we exist, cancel culture will persist, its manifestations shifting but its roots unchanged. Cancel culture isn’t dead — in Australia, it’s more alive and relentless than ever.New footage has emerged of an on-duty Auckland police officer embracing a naked woman by a stripper pole. It follows previous footage showing two police officers dancing on the pole. An investigation has since been launched into the conduct of the two officers. New footage posted to a well-known gang member’s social media shows an on-duty Auckland police officer embracing what appears to be a naked woman inside a private property. It has emerged after video was shared showing two on-duty officers cavorting on a strippers’ pole in the same room. In the new video, an officer can be seen clasping the woman to his chest and lifting her up, before she turns showing her bare back to the camera.1v1 online game 。

Walmart's DEI rollback signals a profound shift in the wake of Trump's election victory

It's extraordinary how quiet nearly 50,000 people can be. Ibrox, a place of unending noise all night, fell silent five minutes from the end when Cyriel Dessers turned inside Archie Gray and looked to all the world like he was going to win it for Rangers. In that split-second, the stadium held its breath. Suddenly, it was about as boisterous as a mouse tip-toeing around a library full of an order of silent monks. Dessers did brilliantly, but not brilliantly enough. This city knows all about the goalkeeping excellence of Fraser Forster. His years at Celtic were full of stellar saves from some of the greats of Europe. The Rangers striker is hardly one of those, but the save was valuable all the same. Fair to say that a point, rather than the three they would have expected, didn't do a whole lot to put smiles on Spurs' faces, but the alternative would have been ghastly for the visitors, who probably got more than they deserved in the end. You have to imagine that Ange Postecoglou was in the ears of his Tottenham players all week, telling them of the dangers of Ibrox, warning them that there was a battle ahead. For all his dominance as Celtic manager, Postecoglou won only one of four times in this place. He knew. His players? Not a clue. They arrived like tourists lost in a hostile city. They gave the impression of a team that expected Rangers to swoon at the feet of a monied Premier League side. Languid, lethargic, lazy in possession. And ransacked, constantly. The terrific Nicolas Raskin mugged Rodrigo Bentancur early on and you took a note. Nice moment that got the crowd going, but could Rangers keep up that work rate and physicality? For how long could they impose their intensity? Then Pedro Porro was done by Jefte and Raskin, again, brushed off Yves Bissouma. Spurs were nowhere near the pitch of it. They looked weak. Soft. Unprepared. Rangers looked ready. Whatever Spurs thought Rangers were going to throw at them, aggression was guaranteed. Quality could be not be banked on - they had plenty of it as it turned out - but passion and heart absolutely could. On the touchline, Postecoglou was going potty, somehow managing to gesticulate wildly in six different directions at the same time in the kind of fluid movement that was utterly beyond the players he was berating. Ibrox rocked as the visitors toiled. Radu Dragusin passed one into touch. Timo Werner gave the ball away with a staggering consistency. Brennan Johnson was easily dispossessed, then started blowing as if already tired. Barely half an hour had gone. Tottenham were in trouble. Little moments had the home fans in raptures. James Maddison tried an outside of the right foot cross-field ball to Werner, but Vaclav Cerny intercepted with ease. Paraphrasing and removing the expletives, the general reaction from Rangers people was: 'Save the showboating for down south, son'. Raskin and his band of marauders kept snapping, kept living in the face of their counterparts. Werner was here in body but not in heart. He became a mistake machine in the face of Rangers pressure. Johnson, the same. Got it, got hustled off it, then got taken off, as did Werner. Kulusevski was the break-class–in-case-of-emergency replacement at the break and he delivered. But before he did, Rangers made them suffer a little more. Two minutes into the new half, James Tavernier, the captain emerging from a grim patch of form, did outstandingly to run away from Johnson and curl one into the path of Igamane. The striker, wholly unconvincing until recently, finished with aplomb. It was deserved. Rangers had the better of it on all fronts to that point and now they had the lead to show for it. Maybe Spurs couldn't believe what they were seeing. And maybe they weren't alone. Rangers have been improving of late, but theirs has been a soft recovery. The characters who were calling for the head of their manager, Philippe Clement, only a matter of weeks ago had been silenced, but it was an uneasy truce, always liable to flare up again when things go wrong. This Rangers had not been seen for a while. Belligerent, but also good on the ball. Pacy, threatening, solid enough at the back even after they suffered the huge loss of their best defender, John Souttar, after little more than half an hour. And this Ibrox was a force, too. Loud, deliriously happy, thunderously angry - an unsettling wall of noise. All the while, Postecoglou waved and flapped and turned away in fury when one of his players - many of his players - went backwards. What he had was a cavalry to call on. Kuluseveski was a game-changer. Dominic Solanke was a big presence, too, in the salvage job. They were both involved in the equaliser, Kulusevski finishing. Postecoglou barely moved. Maybe his heart was singing. Maybe not. It was frenetic and fractious in the 15 minutes that followed. Solanke came close, but Tavernier came up with a big defensive moment to deny him. The Dessers chance was it. That was the moment, or could have been. Forster got them out of jail, but Postecoglou's trial goes on. One win in eight is an uncomfortable case for the defence. For Rangers, a League Cup final to come at the weekend against Postecoglou's old and firing team. A few weeks back, that final looked like a bit of a formality for Celtic. Now? If Rangers can build on the best of this they'll have something to say, for sure.Infosys Innovation Fund will acquire an undisclosed number of Series A compulsory convertible preference shares (CCPS) of the healthtech startup Infosys plans to leverage 4baseCare’s capabilities to help its clients navigate their business transformation Founded in 2018, 4baseCare leverages advanced genomics to develop personalised care for cancer patients IT giant Infosys is investing INR 8.3 Cr (nearly $1 Mn) to acquire a minority stake in healthtech startup 4baseCare. Infosys, in an exchange filing, said that the transaction will be executed via its venture capital arm, Infosys Innovation Fund. In lieu of the investment, the Fund will acquire an undisclosed number of Series A compulsory convertible preference shares (CCPS) of the startup. “Infosys Innovation Fund seeks to partner with AI and deeptech startups such as 4baseCare to complement its capabilities and jointly co-create next-generation solutions bringing the power of innovation to help Infosys’ clients navigate their business transformation,” Infosys said in the filing. This comes barely four months after 4baseCare raised $6 Mn in its Series A funding round led by Yali Capital. Founded in 2018 by Hitesh Goswami and Kshitij Rishi, 4baseCare leverages advanced genomics and next-generation digital health technologies to develop personalised oncology (cancer-related) care for patients. The startup claims to have developed a unique set of comprehensive genomic panels which allows oncologists to choose the optimal targeted therapy for their patients. In 2021, 4baseCare raised $2 Mn in its Pre-Series A round. The fundraise comes at a time when the Indian healthtech startup ecosystem continues to gain ground and momentum as investors bet on new innovations to solve healthcare issues. In September, Delhi NCR-based Redcliffe Labs raised $42 Mn in its Series C funding round led by the Danish Investment Fund for Developing Countries (IFU). In July, B2B healthtech platform Watch Your Health marked the final close of its Series A round at $5 Mn after raising capital from Cornerstone Ventures from India and Conquest Global from Singapore. However, it is pertinent to mention that the sector has been a laggard in the overall Indian startup ecosystem, having managed to raise a mere $7 Bn between 2014 and the first half (H1) of 2024 across 886 deals.

None

Financial giants have made a conspicuous bearish move on Lululemon Athletica. Our analysis of options history for Lululemon Athletica LULU revealed 12 unusual trades. Delving into the details, we found 25% of traders were bullish, while 33% showed bearish tendencies. Out of all the trades we spotted, 3 were puts, with a value of $129,565, and 9 were calls, valued at $489,635. Projected Price Targets Taking into account the Volume and Open Interest on these contracts, it appears that whales have been targeting a price range from $260.0 to $450.0 for Lululemon Athletica over the last 3 months. Volume & Open Interest Trends Looking at the volume and open interest is a powerful move while trading options. This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for Lululemon Athletica's options for a given strike price. Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of Lululemon Athletica's whale trades within a strike price range from $260.0 to $450.0 in the last 30 days. Lululemon Athletica Option Activity Analysis: Last 30 Days Significant Options Trades Detected: Symbol PUT/CALL Trade Type Sentiment Exp. Date Ask Bid Price Strike Price Total Trade Price Open Interest Volume LULU CALL SWEEP BULLISH 03/21/25 $22.1 $21.4 $21.4 $400.00 $104.5K 1.1K 56 LULU PUT SWEEP BEARISH 12/27/24 $15.0 $12.85 $14.94 $400.00 $74.9K 159 50 LULU CALL TRADE NEUTRAL 01/16/26 $116.75 $111.45 $113.95 $310.00 $68.3K 142 6 LULU CALL SWEEP BEARISH 06/20/25 $49.8 $49.55 $49.55 $380.00 $64.4K 230 66 LULU CALL SWEEP BULLISH 01/17/25 $108.5 $104.65 $107.43 $280.00 $53.7K 837 5 About Lululemon Athletica Lululemon Athletica designs, distributes, and markets athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women, men, and girls. Lululemon offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for both leisure and athletic activities such as yoga and running. The company also sells fitness accessories, such as bags, yoga mats, and equipment. Lululemon sells its products through more than 700 company-owned stores in about 20 countries, e-commerce, outlets, and wholesale accounts. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada. Having examined the options trading patterns of Lululemon Athletica, our attention now turns directly to the company. This shift allows us to delve into its present market position and performance Present Market Standing of Lululemon Athletica Trading volume stands at 495,677, with LULU's price up by 0.57%, positioned at $385.69. RSI indicators show the stock to be may be overbought. Earnings announcement expected in 86 days. Turn $1000 into $1270 in just 20 days? 20-year pro options trader reveals his one-line chart technique that shows when to buy and sell. Copy his trades, which have had averaged a 27% profit every 20 days. Click here for access . Options trading presents higher risks and potential rewards. Astute traders manage these risks by continually educating themselves, adapting their strategies, monitoring multiple indicators, and keeping a close eye on market movements. Stay informed about the latest Lululemon Athletica options trades with real-time alerts from Benzinga Pro . © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

9 biotech experts receive awardsThe Pittsburgh Steelers star edge rusher TJ Watt wasn’t happy when he didn’t win the 2023 Defensive Player of the Year Award. Instead, Cleveland Browns star pass rusher Myles Garrett was crowned the best defensive player in the NFL for the 2023 season. It was strange considering TJ, by every metric, dominated Garrett in terms of production. These stats have been used to measure a defensive player’s dominance for decades, but in the 2023 season, it felt like no matter what TJ did, Garrett was going to win the award. That’s why TJ was so upset, but he didn’t say much other than a cryptic social media post before the event. TJ's brother, JJ Watt, was a bit more vocal but still always super respectful of Garrett’s greatness. While JJ expressed his frustration in interviews, he kept the focus on Garrett’s impressive season rather than attacking the voting process. Despite the public respect, it was clear that both Watts felt their brother’s dominance was being overlooked in favor of Garrett. The tension between the two sides has further grown after Garrett has seemed to take shots at the Watt brothers. Garrett dominated the Steelers during the Browns' 24-19 win over Pittsburgh. Browns beat writer Mary Kay Cabot revealed on The Ultimate Cleveland Sports Show on Tuesday that Garrett was really upset by how the Watt brothers handled him winning the award. According to Cabot, Garrett felt personally hurt by the way the brothers responded to his recognition, despite their mutual respect for one another. This has added another layer to an already intense rivalry between the Steelers and Browns. "What happened was TJ Watt poked the bear when he tweeted about those NFL Honors awards last February," Cabot said Tuesday. "That really stuck in Myles' craw. It hurt him. JJ Watt, his brother, kinda chimed in on that. Myles firmly believed that was his moment. They stole his thunder. TJ stole his thunder." Garrett was disappointed to see anyone speak out against him winning the award, stating that he’s never had issues when someone else has won it over him. Cabot believes this frustration fueled his dominant performance against Pittsburgh on Thursday night, where he recorded three sacks and one forced fumble. "He's never thrown shade at a TJ award," Cabot said. "I think he was really, really upset by that. He used that as fuel in that game and boy did it work for him." The first part of this is a bit surprising. The Watt brothers handled the entire situation with a great deal of respect. Sure, you could critique how TJ addressed it, but considering his frustration, he remained remarkably respectful. That frustration stemmed from a heated debate that TJ wasn’t as dominant as Garrett according to some newer, less traditional metrics. In fact it would be more fair to argue that TJ could have said way more than he actually did. Steelers' TJ Watt And Brother JJ Did Nothing Wrong What both JJ and TJ were trying to convey was not to speak negatively about Garrett, but instead show support for the great season that TJ had. A season they both felt should have been rewarded with the DPOY crown. When you compare the stats, it becomes clear why the Watt brothers felt the need to speak out about the DPOY snub. On paper, it seemed almost unfathomable that Garrett would win the award over TJ. On Thursday night, Garrett outshined TJ in a major way, and he's riding high, taking subtle jabs at both TJ and JJ. The Browns are sitting at 3-8, while the Steelers are 8-3. While TJ may not have outperformed Garrett that night, it’s likely that he’ll have the last laugh. Steeler Nation is eagerly awaiting TJ's response on the field to the criticism following his quiet performance against the Browns. This article first appeared on SteelerNation.com and was syndicated with permission.What do Reviews of Real Mitolyn Users Say About Purple Peel Exploit for Weight Loss?

Nearly half of American teenagers say they are online “constantly” despite concerns about the effects of social media and smartphones on their mental health, according to a new report published Thursday by the Pew Research Center. As in past years, YouTube was the single most popular platform teenagers used — 90% said they watched videos on the site, down slightly from 95% in 2022. Nearly three-quarters said they visit YouTube every day. There was a slight downward trend in several popular apps teens used. For instance, 63% of teens said they used TikTok, down from 67% and Snapchat slipped to 55% from 59%. This small decline could be due to pandemic-era restrictions easing up and kids having more time to see friends in person, but it’s not enough to be truly meaningful . X saw the biggest decline among teenage users. Only 17% of teenagers said they use X, down from 23% in 2022, the year Elon Musk bought the platform. Reddit held steady at 14%. About 6% of teenagers said they use Threads, Meta’s answer to X that launched in 2023. The report comes as countries around the world are grappling with how to handle the effects of social media on young people’s well-being. Australia recently passed a law banning kids under 16 from social networks, though it’s unclear how it will be able to enforce the age limit — and whether it will come with unintended consequences such as isolating vulnerable kids from their peers. Meta’s messaging service WhatsApp was a rare exception in that it saw the number of teenage users increase, to 23% from 17% in 2022. Pew also asked kids how often they use various online platforms. Small but significant numbers said they are on them “almost constantly.” For YouTube, 15% reported constant use, for TikTok, 16% and for Snapchat, 13%. As in previous surveys, girls were more likely to use TikTok almost constantly while boys gravitated to YouTube. There was no meaningful gender difference in the use of Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook. Roughly a quarter of Black and Hispanic teens said they visit TikTok almost constantly, compared with just 8% of white teenagers. The report was based on a survey of 1,391 U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 conducted from Sept. 18 to Oct. 10, 2024.

MONACO, Dec. 12, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Scorpio Tankers Inc. (NYSE: STNG ) ("Scorpio Tankers," or the "Company") announced today that it has received commitments from a group of financial institutions for a revolving loan of up to $500.0 million (the "Revolving Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility is a 100% revolving loan, which has a final maturity of seven years from the signing date and gives the Company the flexibility to draw down or repay the loan during the loan tenor. The Revolving Credit Facility is expected to bear interest at SOFR plus a margin of 1.85% per annum and a commitment fee of 0.74% per annum applies for any undrawn amounts. The Revolving Credit Facility is expected to be collateralized by 26 product tankers, which are currently unencumbered, and is expected to amortize/reduce in quarterly installments (starting after the second anniversary of the signing date) with a balloon payment due at maturity date. The Revolving Credit Facility offers the Company an ability to substitute vessels and also includes an uncommitted accordion feature of up to $100.0 million, which may be incurred under the same terms and conditions at no later than 24 months after the signing date. The other terms and conditions of the Revolving Credit Facility, including financial covenants, are similar to those set forth in the Company's existing credit facilities. The Revolving Credit Facility is subject to customary conditions precedent and the execution of definitive documentation, and is expected to close within the first quarter of 2025. About Scorpio Tankers Inc. Scorpio Tankers Inc. is a provider of marine transportation of petroleum products worldwide. Scorpio Tankers Inc. currently owns or lease finances 100 product tankers (39 LR2 tankers, 47 MR tankers and 14 Handymax tankers) with an average age of 8.7 years. The Company has entered into an agreement to sell one of its MRs, which is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2024. Additional information about the Company is available at the Company's website www.scorpiotankers.com, which is not a part of this press release. Forward-Looking Statements Matters discussed in this press release may constitute forward‐looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor protections for forward‐looking statements in order to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their business. Forward‐looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. The Company desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation. The words "believe,” "expect,” "anticipate,” "estimate,” "intend,” "plan,” "target,” "project,” "likely,” "may,” "will,” "would,” "could” and similar expressions identify forward‐looking statements. The forward‐looking statements in this press release are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, management's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in the Company's records and other data available from third parties. Although management believes that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond the Company's control, there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. The Company undertakes no obligation, and specifically declines any obligation, except as required by law, to publicly update or revise any forward‐looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition to these important factors, other important factors that, in the Company's view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward‐looking statements include unforeseen liabilities, future capital expenditures, revenues, expenses, earnings, synergies, economic performance, indebtedness, financial condition, losses, future prospects, business and management strategies in response to epidemic and other public health concerns including any effect on demand for petroleum products and the transportation thereof, expansion and growth of the Company's operations, risks relating to the integration of assets or operations of entities that it has or may in the future acquire and the possibility that the anticipated synergies and other benefits of such acquisitions may not be realized within expected timeframes or at all, the failure of counterparties to fully perform their contracts with the Company, the strength of world economies and currencies, general market conditions, including fluctuations in charter rates and vessel values, changes in demand for tanker vessel capacity, changes in the Company's operating expenses, including bunker prices, drydocking and insurance costs, the market for the Company's vessels, availability of financing and refinancing, charter counterparty performance, ability to obtain financing and comply with covenants in such financing arrangements, changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, general domestic and international political conditions, including the impact of the conflict in Ukraine and the developments in the Middle East, including the armed conflict in Israel and Gaza, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents or political events, vessels breakdowns and instances of off‐hires, and other factors. Please see the Company's filings with the SEC for a more complete discussion of certain of these and other risks and uncertainties. Contact Information Scorpio Tankers Inc. James Doyle - Head of Corporate Development & Investor Relations Tel: +1 646-432-1678 Email: [email protected]Christmas cheese recalled from supermarkets due to potentially deadly bacteriaNissan and Honda to attempt a merger that would create the world's No. 3 automaker

Previous:
Next: 4 player online game

1v1 online game

European Cup News

European Cup video analysis