99 jili slot

99 jili slot Delhi Polls: Ticket race in BJP intensifies

Should you buy shares of Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. at the current price? Is Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. a good choice from a long-term perspective? Should you keep holding Oil India Ltd.? Is it the right time to exit Asian Paints Ltd. to book profit? Mahesh Ojha, research and business development head of Hensex Securities, and Aditya Arora, founder and multi-asset research analyst at Adlytick.in, answered these investor queries and more on NDTV Profit's Ask Profit show. Arora: Sell On Rise Lone survivors of brutal correction, with the Nifty IT correcting the most, leaving stocks in bearish pattern. Bounced back to Rs 1,553 from sharp correction to Rs 1,277 from Rs 1,800-odd levels. Better to take chips off the table at higher levels. Downside can open up very soon. Arora: Buy Good stock for the long term. Shown good strength in the last one and a half years. Ojha: Hold Dividend yield is very attractive. Hold from two years horizon, more than Rs 220 levels to be seen. Arora: Sell On Rise As the stock is going down, valuations are becoming attractive. Stock is making lower-high, lower-top pattern on a technical level If stock makes an attempt to go to levels like Rs 2,340 to Rs 2,370, exit on higher levels. Ojha: Hold If the stock can come at a downside of Rs 2,820, Rs 2,830-odd levels in the present perspective, one can buy more of the stock at those levels. One can hold from a long term perspective. Sales demand and low consumption is doing very well. Arora: Hold On Long Term Correcting significantly from high levels of Rs 760. Support is placed at Rs 764. Stock is in no mood to take support at current levels Wait for sometime on long term, little downside left in this counter. Ojha: Hold Downtrend can see Rs 390-420-odd-level zone where one can undertake lower accumulation. For above Rs 490-494 levels closing, one may see upside up until Rs 530. Arora: Sell On Short Term, Hold On Long Term One of the good outperformers in the market, seeing good corrections in small caps and mid caps. Good time to take chips off the table on short term, Hold if one has a view of more than five years. Arora: Hold Consolidating in a time when FMCG counters are beaten down, correcting. Trading above its important moving averages Has a good scope at touching its swing high of Rs 665-680-odd levels if markets remain stable. Trend remains bullish

November 25, 2024 This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlightedthe following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked peer-reviewed publication trusted source proofread by Monash University In a business-to-business (B2B) supply chain context, business customers who conduct unfair and socially irresponsible business practices have been shown to have significantly decreased suppliers' intentions to continue their business relationships, according to researchers from Monash University and Northeastern University. Published in the Journal of Business Ethics , the study is the first to examine the effect of customers' unethical practices on their suppliers' intention to continue their business relationships , offering new insights for businesses seeking to navigate ethical dilemmas. This study is in a business-to-business (B2B) context, focusing on the relationship between firms; for example, suppliers and customers. Professor Daniel Prajogo, from the Department of Management in the Monash Business School, said the study surveyed 506 managers from small to medium-sized suppliers in Australia, who—due to their size and limited resources —were likely to have weaker bargaining power against their customers. The suppliers ranged from sectors including manufacturing, retail, transport, construction and health care. "Our study distinguished two types of unethical practices displayed by the customer, those being unfair business practices that have a direct negative or harmful effect on suppliers' interests, for example reducing their profitability," Professor Prajogo said. "The other was socially irresponsible practices, such as polluting the environment or paying low wages. While socially irresponsible practices may not have an immediate direct effect on the supplier, such behaviors do have a wider impact on society and may cause indirect harm to the supplier, for example, negative reputational effects. "Our findings show that both customers' unfair or opportunistic business practices toward suppliers and their socially irresponsible practices had negative effects on suppliers' intention to maintain their relationship with their customers. "We also found, however, that the negative impact is balanced by the level of dependence suppliers have on their customers and the benefits they derive from the relationship with the customers. These benefits may lead suppliers to tolerate unfair business practices, as they feel compensated by the customers for any financial hurt or loss suffered. Similarly, the supplier's dependence leads them to endure the socially irresponsible practices of their powerful customers because of their dependence, or a lack of alternative customers in the markets," added Professor Prajogo. Associate Professor Brian Cooper, from the Department of Management in the Monash Business School said, "Overall, our study demonstrated that intention to continue buyer-supplier relationships in response to unethical practices is determined by self-interest and resource dependence. "From our findings, we encourage rethinking on governance in supply chain relationships. While there is no simple answer to mitigate and/or eliminate unethical practices, we call for institutional reformation in supply chain relationships, which can empower small and medium sized suppliers to be on a more equal footing when dealing with unacceptable behaviors from customers." Associate Professor Ross Donohue, also from the Department of Management in the Monash Business School, said, "The ethical implications of this research are critical for business leaders. By understanding how unethical practices affect supplier relationships, companies can better align their behaviors to foster fairer, more sustainable partnerships. "Furthermore, regulators and policymakers have an important role to play in improving fairer business practices, especially when there is a power imbalance between suppliers and buyers." More information: Daniel Prajogo et al, The Effect of Customers' Unethical Practices on Suppliers' Intention to Continue Their Relationships, Journal of Business Ethics (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05742-8 Journal information: Journal of Business Ethics Provided by Monash University

Cerity Partners LLC lowered its position in shares of Axon Enterprise, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AXON – Free Report ) by 2.4% in the 3rd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 9,165 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock after selling 222 shares during the period. Cerity Partners LLC’s holdings in Axon Enterprise were worth $3,662,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. A number of other hedge funds also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Tidal Investments LLC raised its stake in shares of Axon Enterprise by 22.4% in the first quarter. Tidal Investments LLC now owns 4,833 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock worth $1,512,000 after purchasing an additional 884 shares during the last quarter. Cetera Investment Advisers increased its holdings in Axon Enterprise by 280.6% in the 1st quarter. Cetera Investment Advisers now owns 21,067 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock worth $6,592,000 after buying an additional 15,532 shares in the last quarter. Cetera Advisors LLC raised its position in Axon Enterprise by 49.7% in the 1st quarter. Cetera Advisors LLC now owns 7,623 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock worth $2,385,000 after buying an additional 2,532 shares during the last quarter. DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale lifted its stake in Axon Enterprise by 45.4% during the 1st quarter. DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale now owns 16,986 shares of the biotechnology company’s stock valued at $5,321,000 after acquiring an additional 5,301 shares during the period. Finally, Transcend Capital Advisors LLC purchased a new stake in shares of Axon Enterprise during the 2nd quarter valued at about $206,000. 79.08% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors. Insider Buying and Selling at Axon Enterprise In other Axon Enterprise news, President Joshua Isner sold 20,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Tuesday, November 12th. The shares were sold at an average price of $606.15, for a total value of $12,123,000.00. Following the sale, the president now owns 208,166 shares in the company, valued at $126,179,820.90. The trade was a 8.77 % decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through the SEC website . Also, Director Jeri Williams sold 110 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, September 30th. The shares were sold at an average price of $400.00, for a total value of $44,000.00. Following the transaction, the director now owns 1,934 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $773,600. The trade was a 5.38 % decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Insiders sold a total of 210,256 shares of company stock valued at $87,783,120 in the last three months. 6.10% of the stock is currently owned by corporate insiders. Analyst Ratings Changes Read Our Latest Report on Axon Enterprise Axon Enterprise Stock Up 1.9 % Shares of AXON opened at $646.96 on Friday. The business’s 50 day moving average is $483.18 and its 200 day moving average is $376.61. The company has a current ratio of 2.96, a quick ratio of 2.63 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.32. Axon Enterprise, Inc. has a 12-month low of $224.28 and a 12-month high of $652.22. The company has a market capitalization of $49.33 billion, a PE ratio of 167.17, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 13.97 and a beta of 0.94. About Axon Enterprise ( Free Report ) Axon Enterprise, Inc develops, manufactures, and sells conducted energy devices (CEDs) under the TASER brand in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments, Software and Sensors, and TASER. The company also offers hardware and cloud-based software solutions that enable law enforcement to capture, securely store, manage, share, and analyze video and other digital evidence. Further Reading Want to see what other hedge funds are holding AXON? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Axon Enterprise, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AXON – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Axon Enterprise Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Axon Enterprise and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

None

Flux Power Receives Non-Compliance Letter from NasdaqTrump vows to speed up permits for anyone investing $1bn in the US

Anna Moneymaker A Fed rate hike in 2025 may not be out of the question. Forward contracts for the 3-month Treasury bill—specifically the 12-month and 18-month forward rates—are trading above the current 3-month Treasury bill spot rate. This indicates that the Join Reading The Markets Reading the Markets helps readers cut through all the noise, delivering daily video and written market commentaries to prepare you for upcoming events. We use a repeated and detailed process of watching the fundamental trends, technical charts, and options trading data. The process helps isolate and determine where a stock, sector, or market may be heading over various time frames. Michael Kramer is the founder of Mott Capital, and is a long-only investor who focuses on macro themes and studies trends and options activities to identify and assess entry and exit points for investments in his long-term focused thematic growth strategy. He is a former buy-side trader, analyst, and portfolio manager with 30 years of experience tracking market technicals, fundamentals, and options. Michael Kramer leads the investing group Reading the Markets, where he helps a devoted following of members to better understand what is driving trading and where the market is likely heading, both the short and long-term. Features of the investing group include: daily written commentary and videos analyzing the driving factors behind price action; general macro trend education to help members make well-informed decisions based on market conditions, interest rates, currency movements and how they all interact; chat for questions and community dialogue; and regular Zoom videos sessions to discuss current ideas and answer questions. The level of access RTM subscribers and the expertise of the source are unprecedented given that the subscription price is a fraction of similar technical coaching and mentoring services. Learn more. Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Charts used with the permission of Bloomberg Finance L.P. This report contains independent commentary to be used for informational and educational purposes only. Michael Kramer is a member and investment adviser representative with Mott Capital Management. Mr. Kramer is not affiliated with this company and does not serve on the board of any related company that issued this stock. All opinions and analyses presented by Michael Kramer in this analysis or market report are solely Michael Kramer’s views. Readers should not treat any opinion, viewpoint, or prediction expressed by Michael Kramer as a specific solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell a particular security or follow a particular strategy. Michael Kramer’s analyses are based upon information and independent research that he considers reliable, but neither Michael Kramer nor Mott Capital Management guarantees its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. Michael Kramer is not under any obligation to update or correct any information presented in his analyses. Mr. Kramer’s statements, guidance, and opinions are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Neither Michael Kramer nor Mott Capital Management guarantees any specific outcome or profit. You should be aware of the real risk of loss in following any strategy or investment commentary presented in this analysis. Strategies or investments discussed may fluctuate in price or value. Investments or strategies mentioned in this analysis may not be suitable for you. This material does not consider your particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs and is not intended as a recommendation appropriate for you. You must make an independent decision regarding investments or strategies in this analysis. Upon request, the advisor will provide a list of all recommendations made during the past twelve months. Before acting on information in this analysis, you should consider whether it is suitable for your circumstances and strongly consider seeking advice from your own financial or investment adviser to determine the suitability of any investment. Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.Fast fashion is everywhere – in just about every mall, in the feeds of influencers on social media promoting overconsumption, and in ads constantly popping up online. Its focus on the continual production of new clothing is marked by speedy fashion cycles that give it its name. Fast fashion is intended to quickly copy high-end designs, but with low-quality materials, resulting in poorly made clothing intended to be worn once or twice before being thrown away. One of fast fashion’s leading companies, Zara, has a mission to put clothes in stores 15 days after the initial design. Another, Shein, adds up to 2,000 new items to its website daily. While others in the fashion industry are working toward more sustainable clothing, fast fashion is focused on profit. The market’s value was estimated at about US$100 billion in 2022 and growing quickly. It’s a large part of the reason global clothing production doubled from 2000 to 2014. The big winners in this game are the corporations. The industry has a reputation for exploiting workers and for excessive pollution and extraordinary waste. Consumers are pulled into an unhealthy, spiraling pressure to buy more as cheap clothes fall apart fast. Fast fashion also has a growing impact on the global climate. It is responsible for an estimated 8% to 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and its emissions are projected to grow quickly as the industry expands. I teach courses that explore fast fashion and sustainability. The industry’s growth seems unstoppable – but a combination of legislation and willpower might just rein it in. Understanding the harm About 60% of fast-fashion items are made from synthetic textiles derived from plastics and chemicals that start their life as fossil fuels. When this synthetic clothing is laundered or thrown in landfills to decompose, it can release microplastics into the environment. Microplastics contain chemicals including phthalates and bisphenol A that can affect the health of humans and animals. Natural fibers have their own impacts on the environment. Growing cotton requires large quantities of water, and pesticides can run off from farmlands into streams, rivers and bays. Water is also used in chemically treating and dyeing textiles. A 2005 United Nations-led report on cotton’s water use estimated that, on average, a single cotton T-shirt requires about 700 gallons (2,650 liters) of water from crop to clothing rack, with about 300 gallons (1,135 liters) of that water used for irrigation. The chemicals used to process textiles for clothing for the fashion industry also contaminate wastewater with heavy metals, such as cadmium and lead, and toxic dyes. And that wastewater ends up in waterways in many countries, affecting the environment and wildlife. Fast fashion’s high output also creates literally mountains of waste. More than 90 million tons of textile waste ends up in landfills globally each year, by one estimate, adding to greenhouse gases as it slowly decomposes. Only a small percentage of discarded clothing is recycled. From fashionista to environmental guardian In many cultures, people’s self-perception is intimately connected to fashion choices, reflecting culture and alliances. The allure of buying new items comes from many sources. Influencers on social media play into FOMO – the fear of missing out. Cheap items can also lead to impulse buys. Research shows that shopping can also create a euphoric sense of happiness. However, fast fashion’s speed and marketing can also train consumers into “psychological obsolescence,” causing them to dislike purchases they previously enjoyed, so they quickly replace them with new purchases. Famous personalities may be helping to push back on this trend. Social media explodes when a first lady or Kate Middleton, the Duchess of York, wears an outfit more than once. The movement #30wearschallenge is starting with small steps, by urging consumers to plan to wear every piece of clothing they buy at least 30 times. Upcycling – turning old clothing into new clothing items – and buying sustainable and high-quality clothes that can last for years is being promoted by the United Nations and other organizations, including alliances in the fashion industry. Some influencers are also promoting more sustainable fashion brands. Research has shown that peer influence can be a powerful driver for making more sustainable choices. The largest market for fast fashion is Gen Z, ages 12 to 27, many of whom are also concerned about climate change and might reconsider their fast-fashion buys if they recognized the connections between fast fashion and environmental harm. Some governments are also taking steps to reduce waste from fashion and other consumer products. The European Union is developing requirements for clothing to last longer and prohibiting companies from throwing out unsold textiles and footwear. France has pending legislation that, if passed, would ban publicity for fast-fashion companies and their products, require them to post the environmental impact of their products, and levy fines for violations. Changes in consumer habits, new technologies and legislation can each help reduce demand for unsustainable fashion. The cost of cheap clothes worn a few times also adds up. Next time you buy clothing, think about the long-term value to you and the planet. Paula M Carbone is Professor of Clinical Education, University of Southern California. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

‘Normal Gossip’ Is Getting New HostsNone

Chris Mubiru leads Northwestern State over North Alabama 71-58