spin ph app for android
spin ph app for android
Nelly Korda got right back on track in Round 2 of the CME Group Tour Championship, posting a 6-under 66 -- largely fueled by her first six holes. Golf Central analyzes what went right in her bounceback day. The Golf Central crew looks at how the players on the bubble performed during the second round of The RSM Classic. The Golf Central team breaks down Lydia Ko's first round at the CME Group Tour Championship and how it compared to her previous success in the event. Golf Central analyzes what makes Nelly Korda's golf swing so "poetic" before looking back on her even-par CME Group Tour Championship Round 1, which saw her struggle on the greens. Watch highlights from first-round action of the 2024 BMW Australian PGA Championship, part of the DP World Tour. Rex Hoggard reports on Caitlin Clark's appearance at the RSM Classic pro-am, explaining what the star power of the WNBA phenom means for the event and golf as whole. Jeeno Thitikul sits down with Golf Central to discuss her Aon Risk Reward Challenge win, identifying the strongest part of her game and why she strives to inspire more Thai golfers to compete overseas. The Golf Central crew breaks down the 'evolution' of women's sports, particularly through the LPGA and how the CME Group Tour Championship is pushing women's golf to a new level. Amy Rogers reports on the anticipation leading up to the LPGA CME Group Tour Championship and the record $4M paid to the winner, as well as player reactions to the 2025 schedule. Wesley Bryan reflects on his play over the last few months, where he's recorded four top-25 finishes in five starts, before sharing why he's at ease no matter what happens at the RSM Classic. Trevor Immelman joins Golf Central to talk about playing at the PNC Championship with his son Jacob, Scottie Scheffler's year, the new PGA Tour rule proposals and whether Rory McIlroy will complete his career grand slam.The Arizona Cardinals are 6-6 through 12 games, which makes them an average football team. That's much better than the previous two years, which both ended with just four wins. But after two straight frustrating losses, it's not providing much consolation for a franchise that feels as though it should be much better. The latest setback came on Sunday, when the Minnesota Vikings . Arizona never trailed until Sam Darnold threw a 5-yard touchdown pass with 1:18 remaining that proved to be the winning score. It was a mistake-filled performance for the Cardinals, who racked up 10 penalties for 96 yards. That's a big reason they had to settle for five field goals and scored just one touchdown. The Cardinals were leading 19-16 in the fourth quarter and had first-and-goal at the Vikings 5, but Tip Reiman was called for a false start and then quarterback Kyler Murray . The Cardinals kicked a field goal for a 22-16 lead, giving the Vikings the chance they needed to drive for the winning score. Murray threw two interceptions in the fourth quarter. “I thought we moved the ball well,” Murray said. “Again, it just comes down to not scoring touchdowns. Get down there and kick field goals and penalties bite us. It’s bad — it’s bad football.” The loss knocked the Cardinals out of first place in the NFC West, though they're still in decent playoff position. A pivotal game against the division-rival Seahawks looms on Sunday. Second-year coach Jonathan Gannon acknowledged the frustration of Sunday's loss, but said they've got to rebound quickly. “They’re disappointed and down, but it’s the NFL,” Gannon said. “They’ve got to put all their energy and focus into tomorrow.” What’s working Arizona's defense blamed itself for not coming up with a stop on the Vikings' winning drive, but the unit played exceptionally well for most of the afternoon. Mack Wilson and L.J. Collier both had two sacks and the Cardinals held Minnesota to just 273 total yards. For a group that looked as if it might be the team's weakness this season, it was another rock solid performance. What needs help The Cardinals aren't a good enough football team to overcome 10 penalties and get a win — particularly on the road. Reiman had a rough day, getting called for three false starts. His false start on the next-to-last offensive drive — coupled with Murray's intentional grounding penalty — proved to be extremely costly. “That was brutal,” Gannon said. “Just got to figure out ways to punch the ball in for touchdowns there, not field goals.” Stock up Rookie Marvin Harrison Jr. had five catches for 60 yards, including an impressive touchdown catch that put the Cardinals up 19-6. It was Harrison's seventh TD reception of the season. The No. 4 overall pick has been a little inconsistent in his first year, but there's little doubt he's a difference-maker for the offense. He's still got a chance to reach 1,000 yards receiving this season if he averages about 80 yards receiving over the final five games. Considering his talent, that's certainly possible. Stock down Gannon was second-guessed for his decision to kick a field goal late in the fourth quarter instead of trying for a touchdown at the Vikings 4 with 3:29 left. Chad Ryland made the 23-yard chip shot for a 22-16 lead, but the Vikings drove the field on the ensuing possession for the winning score. “I trust JG,” Murray said. “I see both sides. Go up six and make them score; trust the defense to go get a stop. Go for it, you don’t get it, they’ve still got to go down and score. If you do get it, you probably put the game away.” Said Gannon: "Yeah, I mean there’s thought about it. Just wanted to go up more than a field goal there. Definitely a decision point that we talked about. So be it.” Injuries The Cardinals came out of the game fairly healthy. Rookie DL Darius Robinson — the No. 27 overall pick — made his NFL debut against the Vikings after missing the first 11 games due to a calf injury. Key number 1,074 — Running back James Conner's total yards from the line of scrimmage this season, including 773 on the ground and 301 in the passing game. Next steps The Cardinals return home for a game against the Seahawks on Sunday. ___ AP NFL: David Brandt, The Associated PressThe former Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh (1932-2024) , was a teenager when the country was born. Not only did he live, and experience first hand, nearly every historic turn — from the partition of the country to a pandemic that threatened human existence — in the fate of the world’s largest democracy, often, he was the one on the wheel. By the time he passed away, India itself had grown akin to an angry and aspiring adolescent, which is contemptuous of the previous generations’ failings, irreverent towards experience, and oblivious to its own frailty. However, the man soldiered on against a vicious public attack, spoke his mind on important national issues, in his own time and on his own terms. There is a lot that he said in his more than half a century long career as a public servant and a thought leader, but it is no surprise that his most famous quote will be, “history will be kinder to me than the media.” For an average Indian, any one of the following positions would be a dream come true. Singh, despite his humble beginnings, held many such dream chairs and left his mark in each of those offices. Year(s) Position 1957-1959 Senior Lecturer, Economics, Punjab University 1959-1963 Reader in Economics, Punjab University 1963-1965 Professor of Economics, Punjab University 1966-1969 He worked at the UNCTAD Secretariat in Geneva, Switzerland 1971-1972 Economic Advisor, Commerce Ministry 1972-1976 Chief Economic Advisor, Finance Ministry 1976-1980 Secretary, Finance Ministry 1980-1982 Member, Planning Commission 1982-1985 Governor, Reserve Bank of India 1985-1987 Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission 1987-1990 Secretary General, South Commission in Geneva, Switzerland 1990-1991 Advisor (Economic Affairs) to Prime Minister March-June1991 Chairman, University Grants Commission 1991-1996 Finance Minister 1998-2004 Leader of Opposition, Rajya Sabha (Upper House of Indian Parliament) 2004-2014 Prime Minister of India That, after over six decades in public view, and holding so many positions in the government, Manmohan Singh managed to maintain an image that was more of an academic than a politician, or a power broker, says a lot about his ability to keep the spotlight on the issue at hand and not on himself. Singh had no delusions of grandeur about his achievements either. Even as he got the accolades for sealing the India-US nuclear deal, he was ready to share credit with his rival where it was due. ‘I have only completed what you began,’ Singh told his predecessor at the Prime Minister’s Office, Atal Behari Vajpayee, as documented by Sanjaya Baru’s book ‘The Accidental Prime Minister’. He wasn’t a complete pushover either, as many in India would like to believe, for much of his career. Despite carrying no political weight, Singh could threaten a resignation — and he did one too many times — and prevail over seasoned politicians across party lines and the many cabals within his party: the Indian National Congress. The many times Singh threatened to, or actually did, resign 1985: Singh resigned as RBI Governor after a disagreement with the then Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee. Singh had proposed a scheme to allow NRI investments in India which the Late Mukherjee opposed. Pranab Mukherjee, in his own book, denied any role in Singh’s ouster from RBI. Aug 1991: When the government was accused of favouring a bank with dubious credentials, Singh was the Finance Minister March 1992: Singh was attacked by Congress colleague Arjun Singh, who was actually targeting the then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao. Both Rao and Singh stayed on. December 1993: After a parliamentary committee criticised the Finance Ministry’s handling of the Harshad Mehta scam. 2008: He resigned after members of the Congress party tried to stall the India-US nuclear deal. He prevailed and the historic deal for civil nuclear projects went through. Montek Singh Ahluwalia reportedly persuaded the Prime Minister to withdraw his resignation. Source: The Accidental Prime Minister, Author: Sanjaya Baru ‘No power on Earth can stop an idea whose time has come’ — Manmohan Singh said during his first budget speech in the Parliament as Finance Minister in 1991. Manmohan Singh is credited with the sweeping reforms of 1991 when India opened its doors to global capital. But he was pushing the envelope long before that. “...he had articulated decades ago in his doctoral thesis, on the importance of foreign trade and greater openness to the world economy in India’s own development. No Indian policymaker had till then held South Korea up as a role model,” Baru wrote in his book. He watched everything — from the Emergency in 1970s to the anti-Sikh riots, the assassinations of Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi, stock market scams from the 1990s to now, the chaotic era of political coalitions to the emergence of India as a nuclear power in the new century, as well as an array of scams from oil for food in Iraq to cash-for-votes in India, from the 2G spectrum scam to Commonwealth Games and coal allocation scam — and he was in the thick of things. Very few have survived long enough to see all history unfold from such close quarters and even fewer would emerge such few bruises, after a long public life. His untainted image spiralled down only in the final decade and a half of his life when he became the punching bag for the opposition parties and the media as scandals tumbled out of the closet in a government that he led. Yet, the worst allegation against him is that he turned a blind eye when wrongs were committed around him. One could argue that he had never taken political responsibility before 2009. The success of single-handedly pushing through the India-US nuclear deal, possibly, gave him the credence and the confidence that would shape his career thereon. He has never gone on record explaining the choices he made, whether it was to silently remain the Prime Minister while Congress President Sonia Gandhi and her trustees called the shots, or surrender his persona to enable a transition for Rahul Gandhi to emerge as a national leader. Baru called it a ‘fatal error of judgement’ much like Bheeshma — from the Indian mythology, Mahabharata — a patriarch, who could choose his time of death, lived through generations ‘defending a disreputable lot’ , and suffered with them, with a false sense of righteousness. ‘The Accidental Prime Minister’, a book written by former journalist and Singh’s media advisor Sanjaya Baru, gave us a candid glimpse into the heart and mind of the statesman. “None of my predecessors in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) has ever written a full account of his time there,” Baru wrote in the introduction. It could have been written by Singh himself.
Partner and national leader, capital advisory, Deloitte LLP Age 36 I don’t have a particular career highlight to point to, but I take great pride in my resilience and willingness to tackle challenges. I’ve discovered that I thrive in ambiguous and tough environments, where I feel most energized, engaged, and effective. A special thanks to David for encouraging me to push my limits. Navigating the corporate world and making career moves, whether within your organization or externally, can be intimidating. I’ve experienced this process a few times, and each time has been just as challenging as the first. I want to extend my gratitude to Paul for his invaluable guidance throughout. My colleagues describe my leadership style as open-minded. By adopting an individualistic approach and understanding people’s motivations, I can build trust with my team more effectively. Once that trust is established, it fosters openness to feedback and enhances performance. However, trust can be fragile, so it’s essential to nurture it continuously. I’d like to express my gratitude to Dean for his inspiration. My background is primarily in the corporate sector. To be an effective practitioner, relationship builder, leader and colleague, it’s crucial to stay curious and attuned to the dynamics of your market. Transitioning from a technical expert to a leader and impactful marketplace participant is a challenging journey. I strive to think critically, write persuasively and speak convincingly. Charisma is an incredibly powerful trait, and when paired with technical expertise and execution skills, it can create a significant positive influence. I’d like to thank Russell for his insightful guidance. I grew up playing a lot of soccer and continued at the university level. The shift from being a solid youth player to struggling in university was tough. My coach had an old-school, straightforward approach. I quickly realized I needed to learn two important lessons: Success doesn’t happen overnight, and it’s essential to focus on the process rather than the results. Embracing patience and concentrating on what I could control proved invaluable. I’m grateful to Alan for encouraging me to take a different approach. I don’t have a clear definition of success, but I want to thank Brent for encouraging me to reflect on what it means for me. I seek to create an environment where I can thrive in my career and make a meaningful impact on my family and community. This environment can at times feel like a high-stakes game, leading to stress if not managed well. This underscores the importance of creating a disciplined approach to my professional and personal responsibilities. Finding balance between order and chaos is an ongoing challenge, but I’m lucky to have a wonderfully supportive spouse. I make an effort to stay as active as possible, so my days usually include hiking, running, cycling and exercise classes. I play more golf in the summer and ski in the winter. I also love exploring fields outside my expertise, so I often dive into books, podcasts and audiobooks. With young children, spending time with extended family is also a top priority—after all, what’s life about if not connection? Thanks, Stuart, for setting this example. I aspire to have a greater impact on my family, community and country. With children of my own, I often reflect on the kind of world I want to leave for them. We live in a time of uncertainty and conflict, but I believe Canada, with its talented people, rule of law, stable democracy and abundant resources, has the potential to thrive if managed well. Canada is a remarkable place, and I’m committed to doing my part to make it even better. Four people in my life have laid the foundation for my early career success. To my wife, Eliza, thank you for creating a purposeful and shared life; to my brother, Adam, for always pushing me to compete; to my mother, Kathy, for selflessly prioritizing my interests over her own; and to my grandma Diane and late grandpa Pat for exemplifying resiliency, generosity and gratefulness in their life. I am truly thankful to all of you. The commitment to be resilient and to do hard things consciously so I can gain truth, wisdom and a sense of agency Nikkei Place Foundation, and The Nikkei National Museum and Cultural Centre A good book and a beach possibly with a drink that has a lime in it Chilliwack Okeya Kyujiro in Vancouver by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson, by Marcus Aurelius and by Daniel Kahneman Stand up for what you believe in and speak out when others hesitate Dean Kirkham, co-CEO of Trez Capital and Phil Vanderpol, CEO of Vitalus Nutrition I’m a twin and one quarter Japanese.
3 takeaways from the Chicago Bulls’ late collapse in Atlanta
Social media users are misrepresenting a report released Thursday by the Justice Department inspector general's office, falsely claiming that it's proof the FBI orchestrated the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. The watchdog report examined a number of areas, including whether major intelligence failures preceded the riot and whether the FBI in some way provoked the violence. Claims spreading online focus on the report's finding that 26 FBI informants were in Washington for election-related protests on Jan. 6, including three who had been tasked with traveling to the city to report on others who were potentially planning to attend the events. Although 17 of those informants either entered the Capitol or a restricted area around the building during the riot, none of the 26 total informants were authorized to do so by the bureau, according to the report. Nor were they authorized to otherwise break the law or encourage others to do so. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: A December 2024 report released by the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General is proof that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot was a setup by the FBI. THE FACTS: That's false. The report found that no undercover FBI employees were at the riot on Jan. 6 and that none of the bureau's informants were authorized to participate. Informants, also known as confidential human sources, work with the FBI to provide information, but are not on the bureau’s payroll. Undercover agents are employed by the FBI. According to the report, 26 informants were in Washington on Jan. 6 in connection with the day's events. FBI field offices only informed the Washington Field Office or FBI headquarters of five informants that were to be in the field on Jan. 6. Of the total 26 informants, four entered the Capitol during the riot and an additional 13 entered a restricted area around the Capitol. But none were authorized to do so by the FBI, nor were they given permission to break other laws or encourage others to do the same. The remaining nine informants did not engage in any illegal activities. None of the 17 informants who entered the Capitol or surrounding restricted area have been prosecuted, the report says. A footnote states that after reviewing a draft of the report, the U.S. attorney's office in Washington said that it “generally has not charged those individuals whose only crime on January 6, 2021 was to enter restricted grounds surrounding the Capitol, which has resulted in the Office declining to charge hundreds of individuals; and we have treated the CHSs consistent with this approach.” The assistant special agent in charge of the Washington Field Office's counterterrorism division told the inspector general's office that he “denied a request from an FBI office to have an undercover employee engage in investigative activity on January 6.” He, along with then-Washington Field Office Assistant Director in Charge Steven D'Antuono, said that FBI policy prohibits undercover employees at First Amendment-protected events without investigative authority. Many social media users drew false conclusions from the report's findings. “JANUARY 6th WAS A SETUP!" reads one X post that had received more than 11,400 likes and shares as of Friday. “New inspector general report shows that 26 FBI/DOJ confidential sources were in the crowd on January 6th, and some of them went into the Capitol and restricted areas. Is it a coincidence that Wray put in his resignation notice yesterday? TREASON!” The mention of Wray's resignation refers to FBI Director Christopher Wray's announcement Wednesday that he plans to resign at the end of President Joe Biden's term in January. Other users highlighted the fact that there were 26 FBI informants in Washington on Jan. 6, but omitted key information about the findings of the report. These claims echo a fringe conspiracy theory advanced by some Republicans in Congress that the FBI played a role in instigating the events of Jan. 6, 2021, when rioters determined to overturn Republican Donald Trump's 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden stormed the Capitol in a violent clash with police. The report knocks that theory down. Wray called such theories “ludicrous” at a congressional hearing last year. The inspector general's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the false claims about its report. In addition to its findings about the the FBI's involvement on Jan. 6, the report said that the FBI, in an action its now-deputy director described as a “basic step that was missed,” failed to canvass informants across all 56 of its field offices for any relevant intelligence ahead of time. That was a step, the report concluded, “that could have helped the FBI and its law enforcement partners with their preparations in advance of January 6.” However, it did credit the bureau for preparing for the possibility of violence and for trying to identify known “domestic terrorism subjects” who planned to come to Washington that day. The FBI said in a letter responding to the report that it accepts the inspection general’s recommendation “regarding potential process improvements for future events.” — Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck .
Scottish international Adams scores long-range stunner in Serie A win for Torino
Long-suffering sistersJonah Goldberg: This is the trouble with Elon Musk's debut as a federal budget negotiator
Speaker schedules opposition motions after Tories opt against own non-confidence vote
However, the N-Dubz star has since left the jungle following a public vote but viewers of the show are shocked at her actions since. Before heading into the Australian jungle, celebrities often share pictures of themselves in their camp uniforms and the ITV show also shares videos and images of them while they’re in there which they share to their own personal accounts. However, viewers noticed the lack of Instagram posts about Tulisa’s time in the jungle following her exit. A post shared by I'm a Celebrity... (@imacelebrity) Taking to X, formerly Twitter, fans of the show noticed the singer has deleted her posts about the ITV show and her involvement. After leaving the show, Tulisa would’ve been given her phone back so it’s likely she deleted the posts herself. One viewer said: “Why has Tulisa deleted everything from her socials in relation to #ImACeleb”. (function (d, s, n) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; js = d.createElement(s); js.className = n; js.src = "//player.ex.co/player/6754809d-db39-472a-a8e5-411c1ebefb1d"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); js.setAttribute('programmatic', 'true'); js.onload = function () { const playerApi237931 = ExCoPlayer.connect('6754809d-db39-472a-a8e5-411c1ebefb1d'); playerApi237931.init({ "autoPlay": false, "mute": true, "showAds": true, "playbackMode": "play-in-view", "content": { "playFirst": [ { "title": "How much is Ant and Dec's net worth?", "src": "https://large-cdn.ex.co/transformations/production/3dac3c05-257d-45d2-b760-c1524f8b72f3/720p.mp4" } ] }, "sticky": { "mode": "persistent", "closeButton": true, "pauseOnClose": true, "desktop": { "enabled": false, "position": "bottom-right" }, "mobile": { "enabled": false, "position": "upper-small" } }}); }; }(document, 'script', 'exco-player')); Another commented: “Why has Tulisa deleted all traces of I’m a celeb off her socials?” A third called the singer out, saying: “So grateful you delete all trace of I’m a Celeb on your Instagram ey Tulisa?” After public votes, three celebrities have been eliminated from the ITV show so far. Loose Women star Jane Moore was the first to leave while Dean McCullough, a BBC Radio 1 presenter, was the second to be reunited with loved ones. Recommended reading: How much is Tulisa Contostavlos being paid for appearing on I'm a Celebrity 2024? 'Ruined my day': GK Barry disgusted as Tulisa Contostavlos talks eating spiders What is Tulisa Contostavlos' net worth as the N-Dubz star takes on I'm A Celeb? N-Dubz star Tulisa was the third to leave the jungle and said: “It is tough in there, leaving is still a happy thing.” Speaking about her I'm A Celebrity experience, she added: “I just think you're more grateful for everything, the food you eat, being around the people you love, the home comforts, just makes you very appreciative of life.” Tonight (December 3), another celebrity will leave the jungle. I’m A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! continues nightly at 9pm on ITV1, STV and ITVX.Speaker schedules opposition motions after Tories opt against own non-confidence vote
- Previous:
- Next: spin ph logo
